Session 6

Август 9, 2022

Содержание

2. States Session 5
3. 4 fundamental conditions: 1. A state must have a territorial base, geographically defined boundaries. 2. Within
4. The definition of a state differs from that of a nation. A nation is a group
5. IR and the Changing Contemporary World of States 1. Juridical’ statehood
6. 2. The state viewed as a substantial political-economic organization IR and the Changing Contemporary World of
7. The global state system IR and the Changing Contemporary World of States
8. New Patterns of War and Peace: Changes in Statehood
9. Mugabe’s expropriation of the lands of white farmers Stalin’s ‘collectivization’ of agriculture in the 1930s the
10. Economic coercion The UK’s attempts to bring pressure on the Southern Rhodesian regime when it declared
11. Once in control of the state machine, the military, and the police, the typical coercive state
12. The most influential work in the concept and theory of totalitarianism is Hannah Arendt’s The Origins
13. The proper use of force in the liberal state There is a crucial difference between the
14. In the case of external attack the normal agency of the state responsible for defense is
15. Democracies have no magical immunity against such cancerous growths, and their citizens and political leaders have
16. Many of the countries that fall into this category are in Africa where in all cases
17. The emergence of French hegemony in 17th-century Europe - Cardinal de Richelieu (1585–1642) - Chief Minister
18. Karen A. Mingst, Ivan M. Arreguin-Toft. Essentials of International Relations. 5th Ed. 2010: New York: W.W.
20. Скачать презентацию

Слайд 2

States
Session 5

Слайд 3

4 fundamental conditions:
1. A state must have a territorial base,

geographically defined boundaries.
2. Within its borders, a stable population must reside.
3. There should be a government to which this population owes allegiance.
4. A state has to be recognized diplomatically by other states.

The State and the Nation

Слайд 4

The definition of a state differs from that of a nation.

A nation is a group of people who share a set of characteristics.

The State and the Nation

Слайд 5

IR and the Changing Contemporary World of States
1. Juridical’ statehood

Слайд 6

2. The state viewed as a substantial political-economic organization
IR and

the Changing Contemporary World of States

Слайд 7

The global state system
IR and the Changing Contemporary World of

States

Слайд 8

New Patterns of War and Peace: Changes in Statehood

Слайд 9

Mugabe’s expropriation of the lands of white farmers
Stalin’s ‘collectivization’ of agriculture

in the 1930s
the rather ruthless exploitation of state control over the economy in countries such as North Korea and Belarus

Economic coercion

Слайд 10

Economic coercion
The UK’s attempts to bring pressure on the Southern Rhodesian

regime when it declared independence in 1965 were ineffective because Ian Smith’s government was able to secure supplies of vital material, such as oil, via South Africa
A coercive measure to cause major reorientation of a state’s policy was the case of Libya

Слайд 11

Once in control of the state machine, the military, and the

police, the typical coercive state tends to arrogate all power to itself and to use any available means to maintain its monopoly
Political opponents who are seen as potentially dangerous will be either killed or incarcerated in solitary confinement
The typical coercive state of the early 21st century is not a one-party regime.

The epitome of the coercive state

Слайд 12

The most influential work in the concept and theory of totalitarianism

is Hannah Arendt’s The Origins of Totalitarianism (1958)
The most persuasive and powerful theory of the origins of totalitarianism. In an influential study, which was originally published five years after Arendt’s, Carl Friedrich and Zbigniew Brzezinski identify the following key characteristics of a totalitarian system:
A totalitarian ideology professing to be universal in its applicability and a ‘true’ theory to govern the life of the individual and the state;
A single mass party under the leadership of the dictatorship;
A system of state terror in which the key instrument is the secret police;
Total control over communications;
A monopoly of control of the military and military armaments; and
Centralized control over the economy.

The debate on totalitarianism

Слайд 13

The proper use of force in the liberal state
There is a

crucial difference between the use of illegitimate coercion, or violence, by a state that ignores the norms of the rule of law in domestic and international policy and the proper use of legitimate force under the constitutional and legal checks and balances of the liberal state
Citizens have a duty to assist the state in defense of the community against external attack
The problem of the right use of force, however, raises not only issues of moral legitimacy and legality but also some difficult questions concerning the way in which forces should be employed

Слайд 14

In the case of external attack the normal agency of the

state responsible for defense is the armed forces, and in a democracy both government and citizens will expect these defense forces to use whatever force is required to repel attack and defeat the enemy. Moreover it is a cardinal and long-standing principle of democratic government that the armed services should be firmly under ultimate civil control by the democratically responsible government.
In all liberal democracies the army is regarded as the last line of defense against internal disorders, and various constitutional and legal formulas exist to invoke their aid to the civil power in severe disturbances and emergencies. However, whatever the balance of forces deployed by the state to deal with internal violence, there are certain basic principles which must govern the use of such force by the liberal state.

The proper use of force in the liberal state

Слайд 15

Democracies have no magical immunity against such cancerous growths, and their

citizens and political leaders have a duty to ensure that police and security services operate within the constitution and the law.
The other major principle governing the right use of force by the liberal state is the doctrine of minimal force.
The essential principle can also be applied to armed response and armed violence.

The proper use of force in the liberal state

Слайд 16

Many of the countries that fall into this category are in

Africa where in all cases political and economic crises have been deepened by the tragic HIV/Aids epidemic: Congo-Brazzaville, Zimbabwe, and Eritrea are among the ten countries in the world with the highest number of AIDS cases per 100,000 of the population.
The term quasi-states is a more appropriate designation for these states which enjoy the status and symbols of independent statehood but which patently lack the political will and basic capacity for effective governance required to deliver the basic socio-economic needs and security required by their citizens.

Weak, failed, and quasi-states

Слайд 17

The emergence of French hegemony in 17th-century Europe - Cardinal de

Richelieu (1585–1642) - Chief Minister to Louis XIII of France
Georges ‘Tiger’ Clemenceau, Premier of France 1917–20 - Allied victory in the First World War; the shaping of the Treaty of Versailles
British struggle to defeat Hitler - the key role of Winston Churchill as wartime Prime Minister
Hitler, Joseph Stalin, Mao Tse-Tung

The role of the individual and the state

Слайд 18

Karen A. Mingst, Ivan M. Arreguin-Toft. Essentials of International Relations. 5th Ed.

2010: New York: W.W. Norton & Co. ISBN 978-0393935295
Robert Jackson, Georg Sorensen. Introduction to International Relations: Theories and Approaches. 4th edition, 2010: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0199548842
Paul Wilkinson. International Relations: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions). 1st edition. 2007: Oxford Paperbacks. ISBN 978-0192801579

Recommended Literature