Series of theses that reveal what it would mean for engaged
political
theory to be comparative
Comparative political theory ought to be distinguishable from anthropology and area studies;
If the interest in non-Western political thought is grounded in the belief that we might have something to learn about political and social life from writers outside the Western canon, then it becomes less clear what is being compared;
If the interest in non-Western political thought is merely to decenter the canon or to frame cross-cultural dialogue, but without rigorous epistemic or normative standards, then it might be regarded as zoological, that is, a civic act rather than a theoretical or philosophical one.
Clearly, our engaged comparative interest in non-Western political thought arises largely out of a concern with (political) value-conflict.
Comparative political theory will likely have a special and predominant interest in religious doctrine and political thought.