Practical application of the method of Kona-Shema. Pseudopotentials method

Содержание

Слайд 2

Слайд 3

Слайд 4

Слайд 5

Слайд 6

Слайд 7

Выводы

Выводы

Слайд 8

Слайд 9

Слайд 10

Слайд 11

Слайд 12

Слайд 13

Слайд 14

Слайд 15

Слайд 16

Слайд 17

Слайд 18

Слайд 19

Слайд 20

Слайд 21

Слайд 22

Слайд 23

Слайд 24

The large number of surface structures observed on III-V (001) surfaces

The large number of surface structures observed on III-V (001) surfaces

have early on prompted attempts to classify and understand them from a more general point of view. The determination of most stable reconstruction depending on element concentration in the surface layers needs for understanding of its interaction with adsorbates (metals, gases and complex hybrides systems).

INTRODUCTION

Apart from the application aspect, much interest in the structure and stability of the polar (001) surface has also been caused by the rich variety of surface reconstructions which can be observed depending on the surface preparation. The GaAs(001) surface shows a с(4×4) structure for As-rich conditions but changes its periodicity to (2×4)/с(2×8) and finally (4×2)/с(8×2) as the surface gets more cation rich.

Слайд 25

Computational details P. Blaha, K. Schwarz et al. An augmented Plane

Computational details

P. Blaha, K. Schwarz et al.
An augmented Plane Wave

+ Local Orbitals Program for Calculating Crystal Properties
http://www.wien2k.at

Vienna Ab-initio Simulation
Package (VASP)
http://cms.mpi.univie.ac.at

G. Kresse, J. Hafner et al.

full-potential method

pseudopotential approach

Слайд 26

* - S.Lee, S. Lee, M. Scheffler. PRB 69, 125317 (2004)

* - S.Lee, S. Lee, M. Scheffler. PRB 69, 125317 (2004)

(FHI)
** - G. Qian, M. Martin, D.Chadi. PRB 37, 1303 (1988)
*** - N. Moll, A.Kley, M. Scheffler. PRB. 54, 8844 (1996) (FHI)

PSEUDOPOTENTIAL APPROACH (VASP)

The values of lattice parameters for different approximation of exchange-correlation effects

E(k) of bulk GaAs

Total and local DOS of GaAs

Слайд 27

Models of Ga-terminated GaAs(001)-(4х2) surface

Models of Ga-terminated GaAs(001)-(4х2) surface

Слайд 28

ELECTRONIC STRUCTURE Two dimensional Brillouin zone (a) and E(k) for Ga-terminated

ELECTRONIC STRUCTURE



Two dimensional Brillouin zone (a) and E(k) for

Ga-terminated β2- (b) and ζ-GaAs(001)-(4×2) (c), in comparison with As-terminated β2-GaAs(001)-(2×4) (d).


β2

β2

ζ-

a)

b)

c)

d)

Ga-terminated

As-terminated

Слайд 29

ζ-GaAs(001)-(4×2) Adsorption on ζ-GaAs(001)-(4×2) The position of adsorbates (cesium and chlorine)

ζ-GaAs(001)-(4×2)




Adsorption on ζ-GaAs(001)-(4×2)

The position of adsorbates (cesium

and chlorine) on surface
ζ-GaAs(001)-(4×2) after relaxation

S4

S2

S3

S1

Слайд 30

Adsorption energies of Cs and Cl on Ga-terminated ζ-GaAs(001)-(4×2) surface *










Adsorption energies

of Cs and Cl on Ga-terminated ζ-GaAs(001)-(4×2) surface

* S.M. Lee, S.H. Lee, M. Scheffler. Phys.Rev., B69, 125317 (2004).

Локальные ПЭС для Cs на ζ-GaAs(001)-(4×2)

More preferable site

Adsorption of cesium is due to the energy gain for different adsorbates sites and their number on the structural unit cell

Слайд 31

Strong hybridization of As and Ga p-states with Cl p-orbitals together



Strong hybridization of As and Ga p-states with Cl

p-orbitals together with weak s-s hybridization is observed. Local DOS of chlorine depend strongly on its positions on surface. The ionic contribution increases in the interaction of Cl with substrate.

Chlorine adsorption- local DOS for
Cl - ζ-GaAs(001)-(4×2)

Слайд 32

Cs on Ga-terminated ζ-GaAs(001)-(4×2) E(k) for clean surface and Cs in





Cs on Ga-terminated ζ-GaAs(001)-(4×2)

E(k) for clean surface

and Cs in М1, S4, S5 sites and orbital composition
of surface states for clean surface and Cs in М1
Слайд 33

М1,М2 S1, S2 S3, S4 M1 The orbital composition of wave





М1,М2

S1, S2

S3, S4

M1

The orbital composition of wave

function and
their localization on atoms for М1 position

Cl on Ga-terminated
ζ-GaAs(001)-(4×2)

Слайд 34

The charge difference for Cs in M1 –M3, S1, S5, S6

The charge difference for Cs in M1 –M3, S1, S5, S6

positions on Ga-
terminated ζ-GaAs(001)-(4×2). X corresponds the cross section in (110)
plane, Y –(1-10) plane. Yellow and green colors mean the region
with depletion and accumulation of electrons, respectively
Слайд 35

The charge difference for Cl in M1 –M3, S1, S5, S6

The charge difference for Cl in M1 –M3, S1, S5, S6

positions on
Ga-terminated ζ-GaAs(001)-(4×2). X corresponds the cross section
in (110) plane, Y –(1-10) plane. Yellow and green colors mean the region
with depletion and accumulation of electrons, respectively
Слайд 36

Charge transfer Integrated Cs valence charge difference as function of integration

Charge transfer

Integrated Cs valence charge difference as function of integration radius

for different adsorption sites

Ga-
termination

As
termination

The distribution of valence charge difference along binding with Cs nearest atoms: As (left) and Ga (right) for two interface.

The valence charge difference shows the charge redistribution in the surface layers with dipole formation

Electrons accumulation region along Cs-Ga bonding in Т’2 site expresses more pronounced in comparison with T3-site.

Слайд 37

The adsorption energies of Cs for S1 and S2 sites on

The adsorption energies of Cs for S1 and S2 sites on

ζ-GaAs(001)-(4×2) with adsorbed Cs in S4 and S5

Cs adsorption on ζ-GaAs(001)-(4×2) (coverage increase)

S2-S5

S1-S5

S1-S4

S2-S4

Слайд 38

Charge transfer Integrated valence charge difference as a function of spheres

Charge transfer

Integrated valence charge difference as a function of spheres radius

for ζ-GaAs(001)-(4×2) with two Cs atoms

The increase of Cs coverage up to 0.25 ML on ζ-surface leads to increase of charge transfer from Cs to substrate. Apart the factors mentioned for one atoms adsorption the role of lateral Cs-Cs interaction can influence adsorption energies.

The energy of ionization (I) for β2-GaAs(001) is 4.86 eV for Ga-terminated surface and 5.38 eV (5.43, 5.61 –other calculation, 5.5 eV –experiment) for As-terminated surface.
I=~4.9 eV for ζ-GaAs(001)-(4×2)

The values of work function (eV) for S4-S1, S4-S2, S5-S1 and S5-S2 geometries in comparison with Cs adsorption in S4 and S5 sites and their changes in respect to clean surface

Sites dependent changes in the work function is shown in our calculations

Слайд 39

Cs on ζ-GaAs(001)-(4×2) E(k) for ζ–GaAs(001)–(4×2) with Cs adsorbed in S5



Cs on ζ-GaAs(001)-(4×2)

E(k) for ζ–GaAs(001)–(4×2) with Cs adsorbed in

S5 site (a), with two Cs atoms in S5 and S2 (b) as well as in S4-S1 (c)

S5

S5-S2

S4-S1

The decrease of work function at higher Cs concentration is due to filling of the conduction band edge at the addition of the second atom

Слайд 40

Electronic structure of (Cs-O)/GaAs(001) interface Models of (Cs-O)/GaAs(001) interface Total, local

Electronic structure of (Cs-O)/GaAs(001) interface

Models of (Cs-O)/GaAs(001) interface




Total, local surface DOS of ζ-GaAs(001)-(4×2) with adsorbed oxygen and cesium

ζ-GaAs(001)-(4×2)

O –S1

O –S1
Cs -S5

Cs -S5

The change of E(k) upon adsorption

S1-S5 geometry does not influence significantly the work function. The adsorption of Cs and O in dimer bridge S1 position decreases the value of the work function by ~0.3 eV. So the formation of dipole oriented perpendicular to surface at thin coverage leads to better quantum effect.

Слайд 41

Calculated STM images of filled and empty states: I adsorbed in

Calculated STM images of filled and empty states:
I adsorbed in the

M1 position on ζ-GaAs(001)-(4×2)

U =-1.5 V (filled) U =1.8 V (empty)

Experiment by Vedeev A.A. and Eltsov K.H. JETP Letters, 2005. – V.82. – P.46 –51.

calculation

Слайд 42

Calculated STM images: clean ζ-GaAs(001)-(4×2) U =-1.5 V (filled) U =1.8

Calculated STM images:
clean ζ-GaAs(001)-(4×2)

U =-1.5 V (filled) U =1.8

V (empty)

S.H. Lee et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 3890 (2000)