Debating on terrorism

Сентябрь 10, 2022

Главная
ОБЖ
Debating on terrorism

Содержание

2. The morality of the Humanity: the end justify the means? The concern of what is right
3. The morality of the Humanity: the end justify the means? It is necessary to be consistent
4. Principle of Humanity It supposes the use of rational means(effective and not self-defeating) to the end
5. Principle of Humanity Principle of Humanity definitely doesn’t run the idea «the end justifies the means».
6. Definitions of terrorism Ted Honderich: “Terrorism is violence, smaller in scale than war, social and political
7. Definitions of terrorism (including item about killing innocents) Terrorism in intentionally killing innocents is not different
8. Who are these innocents? Innocents, civilians, innocent civilians, noncombatants, innocent noncombatants, citizens, private citizens? Innocents are
9. Who are these innocents? Meisels implies that the innocents are persons not actively engaged in the
10. War intentionally kills innocents on an immeasurably greater scale than terrorism. The definition of terrorism in
12. Скачать презентацию

Слайд 2

The morality of the Humanity: the end justify the means?
The

concern of what is right and what is wrong plays a great role in the life of the society, the use of the words like «acceptable», «unacceptable» (by politicians and diplomats) in order to conceal the uncertainty and vulnerability of judgments.
There is a practice to judge actions not only from right/wrong side, but also as «doing as everyone does».

Слайд 3

The morality of the Humanity: the end justify the means?
It is

necessary to be consistent to make persuasive and confident judgments on wrong and right.
The humanity needs to elaborate a general principle of right and wrong –literal, clear, specific, resistant to self-interest and self-deception.

Слайд 4

Principle of Humanity
It supposes the use of rational means(effective and

not self-defeating) to the end of getting and keeping people out of bad lives, defined in terms of deprivation or frustration with respect to the great goods. Principle of Humanity judges actions, policies, structures by their consequences.
Principle of Humanity has nothing in common with the Principle of Utility or Greatest Happiness, as the first one is not abstract and prohibits victimization.

Слайд 5

Principle of Humanity
Principle of Humanity definitely doesn’t run the idea «the

end justifies the means». It says: «the end and the means justifies the means».
It has the deepest foundations in human nature as the principle intersects with Kant’s uninstructive imperative «treat each person never only as a means, but also as the end» and determines what truth moral principles and moral judgments can have.

Слайд 6

Definitions of terrorism
Ted Honderich: “Terrorism is violence, smaller in scale than

war, social and political in aim, illegal, and prima facie wrong since it is indeed killing, maiming and destruction”. This definition include state terrorism. (Israeli state terrorism).
VS
Tamar Meisels: “Terrorism … is the intentional random murder of defenseless noncombatants, with the intent of instilling fear of moral danger within a civilian population as a strategy designed to advance political ends”.

Слайд 7

Definitions of terrorism (including item about killing innocents)
Terrorism in intentionally killing

innocents is not different from war.
Some terrorism is response to ethnic cleansing or another great violations of a people.
Terrorism that kills innocents and has the support of the Principle of Humanity is directed to the saving of other innocents and also innumerable other victims.

Слайд 8

Who are these innocents?
Innocents, civilians, innocent civilians, noncombatants, innocent noncombatants, citizens,

private citizens?
Innocents are persons not guilty of a crime or offence, not responsible for an event yet suffering it, free from moral wrong. (innocents, innocent civilians, innocent noncombatants)
Civilians, noncombatants, citizens, and private citizens can instigate killings.
Conclusion: objection to terrorism must have to do with innocents rather than civilians, noncombatants, citizens, and private citizens.

Слайд 9

Who are these innocents?
Meisels implies that the innocents are persons not

actively engaged in the Palestinian-Israeli conflict. Innocents are people not themselves killing or wounding Palestinians.
Innocents = noncombatants
Those who instigate killers, pay for them, defend them, profit from them are not innocents.
The innocents are those who do not intentionally somehow take forward the project of neo-Zionism or choose to benefit from it when they could do otherwise. There are fewer innocents than is ordinarily supposed.

Слайд 10

War intentionally kills innocents on an immeasurably greater scale than terrorism.
The

definition of terrorism in terms of killing innocents depends on the comparison with war.
There are several additions to the definition of terrorism:
1 terrorism kills innocents intentionally – thus is not thereby different from war
2 terrorism – is a response to ethnic cleansing or other violations
3 terrorism, that kills some innocents is directed to the saving of other innocents

War and terrorism: correlation of deaths of innocents?

Debating on terrorism

Содержание

The morality of the Humanity: the end justify the means? The

The morality of the Humanity: the end justify the means?It is

Principle of Humanity It supposes the use of rational means(effective and

Principle of HumanityPrinciple of Humanity definitely doesn’t run the idea «the

Definitions of terrorismTed Honderich: “Terrorism is violence, smaller in scale than

Definitions of terrorism (including item about killing innocents)Terrorism in intentionally killing

Who are these innocents?Innocents, civilians, innocent civilians, noncombatants, innocent noncombatants, citizens,

Who are these innocents?Meisels implies that the innocents are persons not

War intentionally kills innocents on an immeasurably greater scale than terrorism.The

Похожие презентации