Discussion, Conclusion, and Introduction

Август 23, 2022

Главная
Английский язык
Discussion, Conclusion, and Introduction

Содержание

2. The Structure of Discussion and Conclusion in Literature Reviews: What do you remember?
3. DISCUSSION ties together the research; describes conclusions; describes the limitations of the studies; outlines recommendations about
4. CONCLUSION restates the problem(s) and research goal(s); describes the results; describes the limitations of the study;
5. WORKSHOP
6. The Structure of Introduction in Literature Reviews: What do you remember?
7. INTRODUCTION describes the problem(s); explains why it is essential to resolve it (them); provides definitions; identifies
8. Varying Definitions of Online Communication and Their Effects on Relationship Research Numerous studies have been conducted
9. Practice Time
10. WORKSHOP
11. ATS
14. Скачать презентацию

Слайд 2

The Structure of Discussion and Conclusion in Literature Reviews: What do you

remember?

Слайд 3

DISCUSSION
ties together the research;
describes conclusions;
describes the limitations of the studies;
outlines recommendations

about addressing these limitations.

Слайд 4

CONCLUSION
restates the problem(s) and research goal(s);
describes the results;
describes the limitations of

the study;
describes possible future work.

Слайд 5

WORKSHOP

Слайд 6

The Structure of Introduction in Literature Reviews: What do you remember?

Слайд 7

INTRODUCTION
describes the problem(s);
explains why it is essential to resolve it (them);
provides

definitions;
identifies a research niche;
finishes with a thesis that describes the goal(s) of the review.

Слайд 8

Varying Definitions of Online Communication and Their Effects on Relationship Research
Numerous

studies have been conducted on various facets of Internet relationships, focusing on the levels of intimacy, closeness, different communication modalities, and the frequency of use of computer-mediated communication (CMC). However, contradictory results are suggested within this research because only certain aspects of CMC are investigated, for example, email only. Cummings, Butler, and Kraut (2002) suggest that face-to-face (FtF) interactions are more effective than CMC (read: email) in creating feelings of closeness or intimacy, while other studies suggest the opposite. To understand how both online (Internet) and offline (non-Internet) relationships are affected by CMC, all forms of CMC should be studied. This paper examines Cummings et al.’s research against other CMC research to propose that additional research be conducted to better understand how online communication affects relationships.

Слайд 9