Содержание

Слайд 2

Types of semantic relations There are four basic types of semantic relations: proximity, equivalence, inclusion, opposition.

Types of semantic relations

There are four basic types of semantic relations:


proximity,
equivalence,
inclusion,
opposition.
Слайд 3

Types of semantic relations beautiful extremely good-looking, much more so than

Types of semantic relations

beautiful extremely good-looking, much more so than most

women
pretty good-looking in an ordinary way but not really beautiful or sexually exciting
attractive good-looking, especially in a way that makes you feel sexually interested
striking very attractive, especially because a woman has a particular feature, such as hair or eyes, that is beautiful and unusual
handsome good-looking in an unusual way, especially because a woman is tall or strong or looks as if she has a strong character
Слайд 4

Types of semantic relations Semantic proximity implies that two (or more)

Types of semantic relations

Semantic proximity implies that two (or more) words

however different may enter the semantic relations of proximity if they share certain semantic features, e.g. the words red and green share the semantic features of ‘colour’, ‘basic or rainbow colour’, ‘complementary colour’, etc.
Слайд 5

Types of semantic relations Semantic equivalence implies full similarity of meaning

Types of semantic relations

Semantic equivalence implies full similarity of meaning of

two or more language units. Being an extreme case of semantic proximity it is qualitatively different from all other cases suggesting the existence of units different in form but having identical meaning, i.e. one and the same content side.
E.g. John is taller than Bill // Bill is shorter than John; stops // plosives
Слайд 6

Types of semantic relations Inclusion exists between two words if the

Types of semantic relations

Inclusion exists between two words if the meaning

of one word contains the semantic features constituting the meaning of the other word. The semantic relations of inclusion are called hyponymic relations.
E.g. vehicle includes car, bus, taxi, tram;
flower includes daffodil, carnation, snowdrop, lily.
Слайд 7

Types of semantic relations The hyponymic relation may be viewed as

Types of semantic relations

The hyponymic relation may be viewed as the

hierarchical relationship between the meanings of the general and the individual terms.
The general term — vehicle, tree, animal — is referred to as the classifier or the hyperonym.
The more specific term is called the hyponym (car, tram; oak, ash; cat, tortoise).
Слайд 8

Types of semantic relations Plant grass bush tree shrub flower pine

Types of semantic relations

Plant
grass bush tree shrub flower
pine oak ash maple
white

pine yellow pine
Слайд 9

Types of semantic relations The contrast of semantic features helps to

Types of semantic relations

The contrast of semantic features helps to establish

the semantic relations of opposition.
Polar oppositions

Relative oppositions
E.g. to leave – to arrive

E.g. rich — poor, dead — alive, young — old.

Слайд 10

Semantic classifications of words synonyms; lexical and terminological sets; lexico-semantic groups; semantic fields; antonyms.

Semantic classifications of words
synonyms;
lexical and terminological sets;
lexico-semantic groups;
semantic fields;
antonyms.

Слайд 11

Synonyms Synonyms are usually defined as two or more words of

Synonyms

Synonyms are usually defined as two or more words of the

same language, belonging to the same part of speech and possessing one or more identical or nearly identical denotational meanings, interchangeable, at least in some contexts without any considerable alteration in denotational meaning, but differing in morphemic composition, phonemic shape, shades of meaning, connotations, style, valency and idiomatic use. They are characterized by the semantic relations of equivalence or by the semantic relations of proximity.
Слайд 12

Types of synonyms Total (absolute) synonyms E.g. inflexion – functional affix,

Types of synonyms

Total (absolute) synonyms
E.g. inflexion – functional affix, linguistics

– philology;
The degree of semantic proximity is best of all estimated in terms of the aspects of meaning, i.e. the denotational, the connotational, and the pragmatic aspect.
1. the difference in connotation E.g. famous // notorious;
2. the difference in the pragmatic value of words E.g. brotherly — fraternal, bodily — corporal.
Слайд 13

Types of synonyms Stylistic synonyms E.g. girl (neutral), girlie (coll.), lassie,

Types of synonyms

Stylistic synonyms
E.g. girl (neutral), girlie (coll.), lassie, lass

(dial.), bird, birdie, jane, fluff, skirt (sl.), maiden (poet.), damsel (arch.)
Ideographic synonyms
E.g. to smile – to have or make a smile – an expression of the face with the mouth turned up at the ends and the eyes bright, that usually expresses amusement, pleasure, approval, happiness; to grin – to make a wide smile, which usually shows the teeth; leer – is an unpleasant smile suggests cruelty, thoughts of sex; smirk – is a silly, satisfied smile;
Слайд 14

Types of synonyms Ideographic-stylistic synonymy E.g. ask — inquire, expect —

Types of synonyms

Ideographic-stylistic synonymy
E.g. ask — inquire, expect — anticipate.
Contextual

(or context-depending)
synonyms
E.g. ‘buy’ and ‘get’ in ‘I’ll go to the shop and buy some bread’ // I’ll go to the shop and get some bread;
‘bear’ and ‘stand’ in the negative form: ‘can’t bear’ and ‘can’t stand’.
Слайд 15

Types of synonyms Intensifying synonyms (relative synonyms) E.g. to ask –

Types of synonyms

Intensifying synonyms (relative synonyms)
E.g. to ask – to

beg – to implore;
to like – to admire – to love – to adore – to worship;
gift – talent – genius;
to surprise – to astonish – to amaze – to astound;
to shout – to yell – to bellow – to roar.
Слайд 16

Synonyms Syntactical distribution: alone can be used only predicatively; solitary and

Synonyms

Syntactical distribution: alone can be used only predicatively; solitary and lonely

can be used both predicatively and attributively;
Morphological distribution: concerns the use of prepositions; E.g. to answer a question, but reply to a question;
Lexical distribution: is based on the difference in valency; E.g. to win/ gain a victory; but to win a war.
Слайд 17

Synonyms. The synonymic dominant Characteristic features: its semantic structure is quite

Synonyms. The synonymic dominant

Characteristic features:
its semantic structure is quite simple:

it consists only of denotative component and it has no connotations;
neutral stylistic connotation;
the meaning is equal to the denotation common to all the synonymic group; it expresses the notion common to all the synonyms of the group in the most general way;
its meaning is broad and generalized, covers the meanings of the rest of synonyms, so that it may be substituted for any of them;
the highest frequency of use;
broad combinability, i.e. ability to be used in combinations with various classes of words.
Слайд 18

Synonyms. The synonymic dominant leave — depart — quit — retire

Synonyms. The synonymic dominant

leave — depart — quit — retire —

clear out
to make – to produce – to create – to fabricate – to manufacture;
to shine – to flash – to blaze – to gleam – to glisten – to sparkle – to glitter – to shimmer – to glimmer;
furious – angry– enraged;
terror – horror – fear.
Слайд 19

Sources of Synonymy borrowing from another language; E.g. belly (Native) –

Sources of Synonymy

borrowing from another language; E.g. belly (Native) – stomach

(French) – abdomen (Latin); gather (Native) – assemble (French) – collect (Latin); end (Native) – finish (French) – complete (Latin);
borrowing from a territorial variant; radio – wireless;
borrowing from a dialect; E.g. girl – lass (Scottish); charm – glamour (Scottish); liquor – whiskey (Irish);
word-formation; E.g. memorandum – memo; vegetables – vegs; microphone – mike; popular song – pop song (due to shortening, mostly stylistic); commandment – command; laughter – laugh (conversion); anxiety – anxiousness; effectivity – effectiveness (affixation); amongst – among; await – wait (loss of affixes);
euphemistic transfers: sweat – perspiration; drunkenness – intoxication; naked – in one’s birthday suit; poor – unprivileged.
Слайд 20

Lexical and terminological sets E.g. the words lion, tiger, leopard, puma,

Lexical and terminological sets

E.g. the words lion, tiger, leopard, puma, cat

refer to the lexical set of ‘the animals of the cat family’.
names of ‘musical instruments’: piano, organ, violin, drum;
names of ‘parts of the car mechanism’: radiator, motor, handbrake, wheels.
Слайд 21

Lexico-semantic groups Words describing different sides of one and the same

Lexico-semantic groups

Words describing different sides of one and the same general

notion are united in a lexico-semantic group:
‘colours’ - pink, red, black, green, white;
‘ physical movement’ — to go, to turn, to run; ‘destruction’ — to ruin, to destroy, to explode, to kill.
Слайд 22

Semantic fields E.g. the words cosmonaut (n), spacious (adj), to orbit

Semantic fields

E.g. the words cosmonaut (n), spacious (adj), to orbit (v)

belong to the semantic field of ‘space’ .
J. Trier’s (a German linguist; the beginning of the 20th century)
Слайд 23

Antonyms Contradictories, e.g. dead — alive, single — married; not dead

Antonyms

Contradictories, e.g. dead — alive, single — married; not dead =

alive; not single = married.
Contraries, gradable antonyms, e.g. ‘old’ and ‘young’ are the most distant elements of the series: old – middle-aged – young; ‘hot’ and ‘cold’ form a series with intermediate ‘cool’ and ‘warm’.