Transactional leadership

Слайд 2

Evolution of leadership theories

Evolution of leadership theories

Слайд 3

Basics Transactional leadership theory was first described by Max Weber and

Basics

Transactional leadership theory was first described by Max Weber and developed

by M. Bass in 1980’s
In transactional leadership leader-follower associations were grounded upon a series of agreements between followers and leaders (House & Shamir, 1993).
The transactional theory was “based on reciprocity where leaders not only influence followers but are under their influence as well”. Managers give employees something they want in exchange for getting something they want.
It posits that workers are not self-motivated and require structure, instruction and monitoring in order to complete tasks correctly and on time.
Слайд 4

Transactional leadership style follows these basic steps

Transactional leadership style follows these basic steps

Слайд 5

Transactional leadership focuses on results conforms to the existing structure of

Transactional leadership

focuses on results
conforms to the existing structure of an organization

and measures success according to that organization's system of rewards and penalties
is based on formal authority and positions of responsibility in an organization
Слайд 6

Transactional leader

Transactional leader

Слайд 7

Dimensions of transactional leadership

Dimensions of transactional leadership

Слайд 8

Contingent Reward It focuses on achieving results. Humans receive concrete, tangible,

Contingent Reward

It focuses on achieving results. Humans receive concrete, tangible, material

rewards in exchange of their efforts.
Manager leaders who use contingent reward are expected to show direction to the employees so the job gets done.
Contingent reward encompass performance-based material rewards, direction- setting, reciprocity, and confidence-building in the team
Слайд 9

Management by Exception (Active) Leaders expect their workers to perform the

Management by Exception (Active)

Leaders expect their workers to perform the job

to a satisfactory standard.
“This type of leadership does not inspire workers to achieve beyond expected outcomes, however, if target is achieved, that means the system has worked, everyone is satisfied, and the business continues as usual,” (Bass & Avolio, 2004).
There is a little sense of adventure or risk-taking, new perspectives, or creativity in case of management. It correspond need-driven change culture.
Managers anticipate problems, monitor progress and issue corrective measures
Слайд 10

Management by Exception (Passive) Leaders avoid specifying agreement, and fail to

Management by Exception (Passive)

Leaders avoid specifying agreement, and fail to provide

goals and standards to be achieved by staff.
Sometimes, a leader waits for things to go wrong before taking action.
Слайд 11

Pros of Transactional Leadership

Pros of Transactional Leadership

Слайд 12

Cons of Transactional Leadership Rewards the worker on a practical level

Cons of Transactional Leadership

Rewards the worker on a practical level only,

such as money or perks
Creativity is limited since the goals and objectives are already set
Does not reward personal initiative
Слайд 13

GOAL SETTING

GOAL SETTING

Слайд 14

Слайд 15

Align Your Goals & Tasks

Align Your Goals & Tasks

Слайд 16

FEEDBACK & PERFORMANCE REVIEWS

FEEDBACK & PERFORMANCE REVIEWS

Слайд 17

High-Quality feedback

High-Quality feedback

Слайд 18

High-Quality feedback

High-Quality feedback

Слайд 19

Feedback models

Feedback models

Слайд 20

SANDWICH

SANDWICH

Слайд 21

STOP-START-CONTINUE

STOP-START-CONTINUE

Слайд 22

BEEF

BEEF

Слайд 23

Exercise Scenarios of a work situation

Exercise Scenarios of a work situation

Слайд 24

Dealing with reactions – H.E.A.R. model

Dealing with reactions – H.E.A.R. model