Easy Offices - Website Audit

Содержание

Слайд 2

Scope of our review The localisation review has covered the following

Scope of our review

The localisation review has covered the following pages:
Homepage
Product

Overview Pages
Office Space
Coworking Space
X2 Location Search Results Pages (one for coworking spaces and one for office spaces)
X2 Centre Pages (picked at random)
Terms
Privacy
About
The tech review has included testing of the following forms:
Get a quote (Main nav)
Send me my quote (Centre Details)
Contact us (footer link)
Слайд 3

How the localisation report works We have evaluated translation quality across

How the localisation report works

We have evaluated translation quality across the

following categories:

Errors can vary in severity:

Critical

Harmful to brand A crucial word that defines the sentence is mistranslated or missing.

Major

Confusing or Misleading As an example “You have accepted the terms” is translated as “You have to accept the terms”

Minor

Noticeable, not confusing As an example “all of our office plans are flexible” translated as “all of our office plans is flexible”

Are dates, addresses, currencies and measurement units adapted to the market?

Meaning

Accuracy / Readability

Grammar / Spelling / Punctuation

Dates/Currencies/Addresses/ Measurements

Is the meaning and nuance of the original source conveyed?

Does the text sound natural and fluent? Is the correct terminology used?

Are standard grammar / spelling and punctuation rules followed?

Imagery / Videos / Maps

Have images, videos or maps been localised? Are they culturally appropriate for the market?

Tone

Has the correct tone been used (e.g. formal / informal) and is it consistent throughout the website? Are the greetings and naming conventions appropriate?

Is the content displayed in the correct layout (e.g. right-to-left or left-to-right)? Are special characters displayed correctly?

Layout / Special Characters

Untranslated Content

Has some content been left in English or in another language?

Слайд 4

How the technical report works We have evaluated technical quality across

How the technical report works

We have evaluated technical quality across 5

main areas:

Browser & device compatibility

Broken / missing links

Broken / missing images

Form functionality

We have reviewed selected pages across the two most popular browsers Chrome (63%) & Safari (19%) and looked at desktop, tablet and mobile.

We will check the links across the selected pages that we review checking for broken or missing links.

High-quality images without distortion

Testing of form submissions across a number of pages ensuring there are no issues enquiring.

Errors can vary in severity:

Critical

Harmful to brand An issue that is likely to prevent a user from enquiring.

Major

Inconvenient The issue is an inconvenience or annoying but there are clear workarounds or alternates.

Minor

Small/background issue A very small or barely noticeable issue that can be addressed when time permits.

Site load time

Longer load time / page speed tends to result in a higher bounce rate and lower avg. time on page.

Слайд 5

We’ve scored the ecommerce journey as well as core pages Using

We’ve scored the ecommerce journey as well as core pages

Using the

following bandings we have given an overall localisation score and overall front end technical score.
Слайд 6

General Overview

General Overview

Слайд 7

We assign a score of 0-3 (low to high) to each

We assign a score of 0-3 (low to high) to each

webpage. Based on this scoring, we determine the average score of a specific page and an overall score for your website.
3 - Excellent
2 - Acceptable
1 - Needs improvement
0 - Critical

Scoring of core pages: Excellent 94/108

*Ensure your browser is not restricting / limiting location services before testing.

Слайд 8

We assign a score of 0-3 (low to high) to each

We assign a score of 0-3 (low to high) to each

webpage. Based on this scoring, we determine the average score of a specific page and an overall score for your website.
3 - Excellent
2 - Acceptable
1 - Needs improvement
0 - Critical

Scoring of location and centre pages: Excellent 68/72

*Ensure your browser is not restricting / limiting location services before testing.

Слайд 9

Localisation Review

Localisation Review

Слайд 10

Localisation issue #1

Localisation issue #1

Слайд 11

Localisation issue #2

Localisation issue #2

Слайд 12

Localisation issue #3

Localisation issue #3

Слайд 13

Localisation issue #4

Localisation issue #4

Слайд 14

Localisation issue #5

Localisation issue #5

Слайд 15

Localisation issue #6

Localisation issue #6

Слайд 16

Localisation issue #7

Localisation issue #7

Слайд 17

Localisation issue #8

Localisation issue #8

Слайд 18

Localisation issue #9

Localisation issue #9

Слайд 19

Localisation issue #10

Localisation issue #10

Слайд 20

Localisation issue #11

Localisation issue #11

Слайд 21

Localisation issue #12

Localisation issue #12

Слайд 22

Localisation issue #13

Localisation issue #13

Слайд 23

Localisation issue #14

Localisation issue #14

Слайд 24

Localisation issue #15

Localisation issue #15

Слайд 25

Localisation issue #16

Localisation issue #16

Слайд 26

Localisation issue #17

Localisation issue #17

Слайд 27

Localisation issue #18

Localisation issue #18

Слайд 28

Localisation issue #19

Localisation issue #19

Слайд 29

Localisation issue #20

Localisation issue #20

Слайд 30

Localisation issue #21

Localisation issue #21

Слайд 31

Localisation issue #22

Localisation issue #22

Слайд 32

Localisation issue #23

Localisation issue #23

Слайд 33

Localisation issue #24

Localisation issue #24

Слайд 34

Localisation issue #25

Localisation issue #25

Слайд 35

Localisation issue #26

Localisation issue #26

Слайд 36

Localisation issue #27

Localisation issue #27

Слайд 37

Technical Review

Technical Review

Слайд 38

Technical issue #1

Technical issue #1

Слайд 39

Technical issue #2

Technical issue #2

Слайд 40

Technical issue #3

Technical issue #3

Слайд 41

Technical issue #4

Technical issue #4

Слайд 42

Technical issue #5

Technical issue #5

Слайд 43

Recommendations & opinions

Recommendations & opinions

Слайд 44

Remarks The site is generally easy to navigate and understandable. The

Remarks

The site is generally easy to navigate and understandable.
The translations are

also very good, except for minor localisation problems.
Loading speed is excellent.

Yes, the design is very well.

When I first filled out the form, I entered my own mobile phone. A short time later I was called for information. I wanted to mention that because calling for information in a short time is an important point for customers.
The abbreviation of Turkish Lira is “TRY” on the site. While the abbreviation “TRY” is used globally, the abbreviation “TL” is more common. Maybe you can consider changing it this way.

What do you like or dislike about the website? Why?

Does this feel like it was designed for your market? If not, why not?

Is there anything you haven’t already mentioned that you would recommend that we change or add?