Émile Benveniste (1902-1976)

Содержание

Слайд 2

Émile Benveniste (1902-1976)

Émile Benveniste (1902-1976)

Слайд 3

Émile Benveniste (French: [bɛ̃venist])was a French structural linguist and semiotician. He

Émile Benveniste (French: [bɛ̃venist])was a French structural linguist and semiotician.

 He is best known for his work on Indo-European languages and

his critical reformulation of the linguistic paradigm established by Ferdinand de Saussure.
Слайд 4

Biography Benveniste was born in Aleppo,Syria. Initially studying under Antoine Meillet,

Biography

Benveniste was born in Aleppo,Syria.

Initially studying under Antoine Meillet, a former student of Saussure, at the Sorbonne, he began teaching at the École Pratique des Hautes Études and was elected to the Collège de France a decade later in 1937 as professor of linguistics.

Слайд 5

Now check yourself! https://learningapps.org/display?v=pv7c7jekt18

Now check yourself!

https://learningapps.org/display?v=pv7c7jekt18

Слайд 6

Émile Benveniste aroused some controversy for challenging the influential Saussurian notion of the sign VS

Émile Benveniste aroused some controversy for challenging the influential Saussurian notion of

the sign

VS

Слайд 7

Saussure argued that the relationship between the signified and signifier was

Saussure argued that the relationship between the signified and signifier was

psychological, and purely arbitrary. Benveniste challenged this model in his « Nature du signe linguistique»
Слайд 8

Ferdinand de Saussure decided that the linguistic sign is arbitrary. Example:

Ferdinand de Saussure decided that the linguistic sign is arbitrary. Example: the

same animal is called bœuf in one country and Ochs elsewhere
Слайд 9

Émile Benveniste supposed that the connection between the signifier and the

Émile Benveniste supposed that the connection between the signifier and the

signified is not arbitrary. On the contrary, it is necessary.
Слайд 10

There is such a close symbiosis between them that the concept

There is such a close symbiosis between them that the concept of

bœuf is like the soul of the sound image bÖf
Слайд 11

The publication of his monumental text, Problèmes de linguistique générale or

The publication of his monumental text, Problèmes de linguistique générale or Problems in General

Linguistics, would elevate his position to much wider recognition.

 1966

1974

Слайд 12

Main ideas 1) Benveniste repudiated behaviourist linguistic interpretations by demonstrating that

Main ideas

1) Benveniste repudiated behaviourist linguistic interpretations by demonstrating that human

speech, unlike the so-called languages of bees and other animals, cannot be merely reduced to a stimulus-response system.
Слайд 13

2) The I–you polarity is another important development explored in the text Main ideas

2) The I–you polarity is another important development explored in the

text

Main ideas

Слайд 14

"I signifies "the person who is uttering the present instance of

"I signifies "the person who is uttering the present instance of the

discourse containing I." This instance is unique by definition and has validity only in its uniqueness ... I can only be identified by the instance of discourse that contains it and by that alone."
Слайд 15

You, on the other hand, is defined in this way: "by

You, on the other hand, is defined in this way: "by introducing

the situation of "address," we obtain a symmetrical definition for you as "the individual spoken to in the present instance of discourse containing the linguistic instance of you."
Слайд 16

These definitions refer to I and you as a category of

These definitions refer to I and you as a category of language and are related

to their position in language."
Слайд 17

The "third person" represents the unmarked member of the correlation of

The "third person" represents the unmarked member of the correlation of

person. By their function and by their nature, they are completely different from I and you
Слайд 18

As has long been seen, forms like he, him, that, etc.

As has long been seen, forms like he, him, that, etc.

only serve as abbreviated substitutes (Pierre is sick; he has a "fever"); they replace or relay one or another of the material elements of the utterance
Слайд 19

3)Benveniste saw language itself as a "discursive instance", i.e., fundamentally as

 

3)Benveniste saw language itself as a "discursive instance", i.e., fundamentally as

discourse. This discourse is, in turn, the actual utilisation, the very enactment, of language.

Main ideas

Слайд 20

Now , check your knowledge! https://learningapps.org/display?v=pt98s9h4n18

Now , check your knowledge!

https://learningapps.org/display?v=pt98s9h4n18