Operational risk management ORM

Содержание

Слайд 2

Slide Enterprise risk management Significant increase in risks faced by people

Slide

Enterprise risk management

Significant increase in risks faced by people and

organizations
Corporate governance and disclosure rules, along with the independent board of directors rapidly gaining importance among companies
Increasing pressure from rating agencies to establish a strong risk management focus in the company
ERM vital element in most corporations.
ORM important part of ERM
Слайд 3

Slide Operational Risk Management Operational risk: Expected and unexpected economic impact

Slide

Operational Risk Management

Operational risk:
Expected and unexpected economic impact of inadequate

or failed internal processes, people, system or external events
Should be minimized
Affects other risks
Слайд 4

Slide Operational risk management ORM role: Ensure operational risks identified and

Slide

Operational risk management

ORM role:
Ensure operational risks identified and effectively and

efficiently managed
Reduce risk to predefined limits in cost-effective manner
Ensure legal requirements and internally set limits are followed
Слайд 5

Slide Operational risk management The ORM structure: Clearly defined Clearly identifies

Slide

Operational risk management

The ORM structure:
Clearly defined
Clearly identifies roles and responsibilities


Risk owners
Risk takers
Risk controllers
Слайд 6

Slide Operational risk management Five key steps of ORM process: Identification

Slide

Operational risk management

Five key steps of ORM process:
Identification and classification
Assessment,

measurement and mitigation
Monitoring and assurance
Reporting
Steering decisions
Слайд 7

Slide Operational risk management Elements supporting ORM Risk and control self

Slide

Operational risk management

Elements supporting ORM
Risk and control self assessment
Key risk

indicators
Loss-event database
Audits
SOX
ORM awareness
Слайд 8

Slide ORM: Risk and control self assessment Risk and control self

Slide

ORM: Risk and control self assessment

Risk and control self assessment

(RCSA) as management tool to
Identify
Assess
Measure
Mitigate
Organization’s needs determine level of detail
Several RCSA systems currently available
Слайд 9

Slide ORM: Risk and control self assessment Identification and classification of

Slide

ORM: Risk and control self assessment

Identification and classification of operational

risks
Identify events that could have a significant negative financial or reputational impact on the company
Basel II four risk categories:
Process
People
System
External events
Usefulness of common definitions and descriptions of risks and risk categories
Слайд 10

Slide ORM: Risk and control self assessment Identification of controls Key

Slide

ORM: Risk and control self assessment

Identification of controls
Key objective: reduce

operational risk exposure to acceptable level
Preventive and detective controls
Recommend no more than six to eight controls per risk
Possible mitigation of more than one risk by the same control
Слайд 11

Slide ORM: Risk and control self assessment Assessment Operational risk exposure

Slide

ORM: Risk and control self assessment

Assessment
Operational risk exposure
Severity: most likely

monetary loss in the absence of any internal controls
Frequency: how often an event of at least the size of severity is expected to occur in the absence of any internal controls
Inherent risk: risk measure in the absence of internal controls
Residual risk: remaining level of risk after controls in place.
Слайд 12

Slide ORM: Risk and control self assessment Inherent risk value Identify

Slide

ORM: Risk and control self assessment

Inherent risk value
Identify significant potential

loss exposure
Identify areas requiring mitigation activities
Residual risk value
Identify inadequate control
Focus of remediation activities
Areas with residual risk value outside acceptable limits.
Слайд 13

Slide ORM: Risk and control self assessment Control assessment Control design

Slide

ORM: Risk and control self assessment

Control assessment
Control design effectiveness
Level of

risk mitigation
Rated: very high, high, medium and low
Control operating effectiveness
Operational control quality in practice
Rated: fully effective (“green”), partially effective (“amber”), or not effective (“red”)
Effective, well-designed controls
Reduce the expected loss
Reduce the standard deviation of that loss
Слайд 14

Slide ORM: Risk and control self assessment Measurement Failure rates of

Slide

ORM: Risk and control self assessment

Measurement
Failure rates of control design

and control operating effectiveness together with severity and frequency of inherent risk
Allow to calculate expected annual loss amounts for every residual risk
Basis for calculating required capital for operational risk
Слайд 15

Slide ORM: Risk and control self assessment Mitigation Compare expected losses

Slide

ORM: Risk and control self assessment

Mitigation
Compare expected losses with a

predefined risk acceptance limit
Raise an issue and/or an action plan
Take an appropriate mitigation steps
Слайд 16

Slide ORM: Key risk indicators Key risk indicators (KRI) Measures that

Slide

ORM: Key risk indicators

Key risk indicators (KRI)
Measures that provide information

about organization or levels of activity indicating potential or actual changes in risk exposure
One of the basic elements of an effective ORM
Identify areas requiring management attention and/or action
Monitor changes in risk profile and controls performance
Require meaningful benchmark and margins
Слайд 17

Slide ORM: Loss-event database Loss event database Loss event: occurrence that

Slide

ORM: Loss-event database

Loss event database
Loss event: occurrence that leads to

a financial cost, lost benefit or both.
A loss event database
Captures losses and incidents
Serves as
Learning tool
Input to risk quantification
Слайд 18

Slide ORM: Audits Audits Crucial function of ORM Through audits, operational

Slide

ORM: Audits

Audits
Crucial function of ORM
Through audits, operational processes can be

checked, issues raised and corrective action determined.
Internal or external audits
Good control of company operations by thoughtful audit coverage planning and execution
Significant help in managing risks through reporting audits’ activities, substandard results, and follow up on an audits’ open issues

Confidential
© 2006 Swiss Re
All rights reserved

Слайд 19

Slide ORM: Sarbanes-Oxley Act Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) Introduced by US Congress

Slide

ORM: Sarbanes-Oxley Act

Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX)
Introduced by US Congress in 2002

after major US corporate scandals.
Compliance with Act by all publicly-traded companies in US
One of primary goals to help restore investor confidence.
SOX important part of operational risk management process.
Compliance with SOX enhances management of operational risks.
Слайд 20

Slide ORM: Sarbanes-Oxley Act SOX compliance requirement: All applicable companies must

Slide

ORM: Sarbanes-Oxley Act

SOX compliance requirement:
All applicable companies must establish financial

accounting framework that can generate financial reports readily verifiable with traceable source data.
Source data must remain intact and cannot undergo undocumented revisions.
Revisions to financial or accounting software must be fully documented
Слайд 21

Slide ORM awareness ORM awareness Essential part of effective risk management.

Slide

ORM awareness

ORM awareness
Essential part of effective risk management.
Raised throughout company

by implementing open operational risk culture:
Employees openly report operational risks and losses
Active learning from mistakes encouraged
Active promotion with full support, engagement of senior management, board of directors
Слайд 22

Slide Increased awareness of operational risks triggered by corporate failures made

Slide

Increased awareness of operational risks triggered by corporate failures made

operational risk management integral part of every company
Shareholders, regulators, and rating agencies dictate tight control to minimize related losses
Implementing assurance framework helps utilize best practices and provides proactive response to avoid future scandals
Слайд 23

Why ORM? To Ensure Necessary Risks are Taken ORM: Is an

Why ORM? To Ensure Necessary Risks are Taken

ORM:
Is an important tool

for training realism
Provides potential to expand capabilities
Assures necessary risk taking to enhance superiority
Слайд 24

What is Operational Risk Management? Natural evolution from traditional risk management

What is Operational Risk Management?

Natural evolution from traditional risk management

Systematic decision-making

tool that balances risk cost & benefits
Слайд 25

OBJECTIVE AND GOALS IDENTIFY, CONTROL, AND DOCUMENT HAZARDS IDENTIFY, CONTROL, AND

OBJECTIVE AND GOALS

IDENTIFY, CONTROL, AND DOCUMENT HAZARDS

IDENTIFY, CONTROL, AND DOCUMENT OPPORTUNITIES

EVALUATE

AND MINIMIZE RISKS

EVALUATE AND MAXIMIZE GAIN

PREVENT OR MITIGATE LOSSES

ADVANCE OR OPTIMIZE GAIN

CONSERVE PERSONNEL & RESOURCES

MAXIMUM
CAPABILITY

Слайд 26

4 KEY ORM PRINCIPLES 1. Accept no unnecessary risks. 2. Make

4 KEY ORM PRINCIPLES

1. Accept no unnecessary risks.

2. Make risk decisions

at the appropriate level.
3. Accept risks when benefits outweigh costs.
4. Integrate ORM into doctrine and planning at all levels.
Слайд 27

BUT.... NOBODY TAKES “UNNECESSARY” RISKS? If all the hazards that could

BUT.... NOBODY TAKES “UNNECESSARY” RISKS?

If all the hazards that could have

been detected have not been detected then unnecessary risks are being accepted.

The single greatest advantage of ORM over traditional risk management is the consistent detection of 50%+ more hazards.

1. Accept No Unnecessary Risks

Слайд 28

2. Make Risk Decisions at the Appropriate Level Factors below become

2. Make Risk Decisions at the Appropriate Level

Factors below become basis

of a decision- making system to guide leaders
Who will answer in the event of a mishap?
Who is the senior person at the scene?
Who possesses best insight into the full benefits and costs of a risk?
Who has the resources to mitigate the risk?
What level makes the most operational sense?
What level makes these types of decisions in other activities?
Who will have to make this decision in combat operations?
Слайд 29

WHAT HAPPENS WHEN AN ORGANIZATION STOPS TAKING RISKS? WEBSTER: “BUREAUCRACY: A

WHAT HAPPENS WHEN AN ORGANIZATION STOPS TAKING RISKS?

WEBSTER: “BUREAUCRACY: A system

of administration
characterized by lack of initiative and flexibility, by indifference
to human needs or public opinion, and by a tendency to defer
decisions to superiors or to impede action with red tape.”

MAINTAINING A BOLD, RISK-TAKING
ORGANIZATION IS ALWAYS A CHALLENGE
WHEN YOUR UNIT IS NOT ON A MISSION.
ORM HELPS.

3. Accept Risks When Benefits Outweigh Costs.

Слайд 30

Operational Process Operational Process Operational Process Loss Control Staff Injects Operational

Operational
Process

Operational
Process

Operational
Process

Loss Control
Staff Injects

Operational
Leaders Add-On

This is the

one we
want!!

4. Integrate ORM Into Doctrine and Planning At All Levels.

Слайд 31

and all their sub-processes WHAT IS AN “OPERATIONAL PROCESS”?

and all their sub-processes

WHAT IS AN “OPERATIONAL PROCESS”?

Слайд 32

ORM IS BASED ON SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT CONCEPTS

ORM IS BASED ON SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT CONCEPTS

Слайд 33

THE ORM 6-STEP PROCESS

THE ORM 6-STEP PROCESS

Слайд 34

Step 1 - Identify the Hazard Process: Emphasize hazard ID tools.

Step 1 - Identify the Hazard

Process: Emphasize hazard ID tools. Adds

rigor and early detection.

Output: Significant (50%+) improvement in the detection of hazards.

Слайд 35

7 Primary Hazard ID Tools Operations Analysis/Flow Diagram Preliminary Hazard Analysis

7 Primary Hazard ID Tools

Operations Analysis/Flow Diagram
Preliminary Hazard Analysis
What If
Scenario
Logic Diagrams
Change

Analysis
Cause and Effect

BROAD RANGE OF APPLICATION AT ANY LEVEL

Слайд 36

Specialized and Advanced Hazard ID Tools Specialized tools accomplish specific ORM

Specialized and Advanced Hazard ID Tools

Specialized tools accomplish specific ORM objectives.
Map

analysis, interface analysis, mission protection tools, training realism, opportunity assessment

Advanced tools are used by specialists and professionals to add depth to ORM applications

Слайд 37

EXAMPLE: THE DRIVE TO WORK What if the car catches fire.

EXAMPLE:
THE DRIVE TO WORK

What if the car catches fire.

WHAT IF

ANALYSIS

What if a carjack is attempted.
What if I have to take an unknown detour.
What if I run out of gas.
What if another car rear ends me.

Слайд 38

Step 2 - Assess the Risk Process: All hazards evaluated for

Step 2 - Assess the Risk

Process: All hazards evaluated for total

impact on mission or activity. Root causes determined and risk levels assigned (EH, H, M, L)

Output: Personnel throughout the organization know the priority risk issues of the command and of their function.

Слайд 39

THE ASSESSMENT TOOLS ADD OBJECTIVITY TO THE EVALUATION OF RISK Risk

THE ASSESSMENT TOOLS ADD OBJECTIVITY TO THE EVALUATION OF RISK

Risk assessment

matrix: Requires specific evaluations of severity, probability, and when necessary, exposure

Totem pole: Induces the prioritization of risk issues across functions and across the organization

Слайд 40

THE RISK ASSESSMENT MATRIX KEY TOOL FOR RISK ASSESSMENT

THE RISK ASSESSMENT MATRIX
KEY TOOL FOR RISK ASSESSMENT

Слайд 41

EXAMPLE: THE DRIVE TO WORK What if the car catches fire.

EXAMPLE:
THE DRIVE TO WORK

What if the car catches fire.
What if a

carjack is attempted.
What if I have to take an unknown detour.
What if I run out of gas.
What if another car rear ends me.

MED

HIGH

LOW

MED

MED

Слайд 42

Step 3 - Analyze Risk Control Measures Process: Comprehensive risk control

Step 3 - Analyze Risk Control Measures

Process: Comprehensive risk control options

are developed for risks based on a worst-first basis.

Output: A full range of cost effective, mission supportive, risk controls for the consideration of the decision maker.

Слайд 43

The Risk Control Option Tools Add Scope & Depth Basic or

The Risk Control Option Tools Add Scope & Depth

Basic or “macro”

risk control options: Reject, Avoid, Delay, Transfer, Spread, Accept, Compensate, Reduce

Risk control options matrix: 46 specific “reduce-focused” control options - applicable at up to four levels in the organization

Слайд 44

EXAMPLE: THE DRIVE TO WORK What if the car catches fire

EXAMPLE:
THE DRIVE TO WORK

What if the car catches fire
Macro options:
Transfer -

Insurance
Reduce (use Control Options Matrix) -
Engineer gas tank
Drive defensively
Focused maintenance
Emergency response plan & equipment

MEDIUM

Слайд 45

Step 4 - Make Control Decisions Process: A decision-making system gets

Step 4 - Make Control Decisions

Process: A decision-making system gets risk

decisions to the right person, at the right time, with the right support.

Output: Personnel know their decision-making authority and limitations and take necessary risks.

Слайд 46

ORM Uses Proven Decision-making Tools Decision-making systems get the decision to

ORM Uses Proven Decision-making Tools

Decision-making systems get the decision to the

right person, at the right time, with the right support

Basic cost benefit and return on investment analysis assure maximum benefit for the risk control $
Decision-making matrices and other modern decision-making tools improve decision quality
The leader question list induces better staff inputs

Слайд 47

ESTABLISHING A DECISION MAKING GUIDELINE EXAMPLE RISK LEVEL DECISION LEVEL Extremely

ESTABLISHING A DECISION MAKING GUIDELINE

EXAMPLE
RISK LEVEL DECISION LEVEL
Extremely High Wing Commander or

specifically authorized designee
High Group Commander or specifically authorized designee
Medium Flight leader, or senior leader on the scene
Low Any person in a leadership position
Слайд 48

EXAMPLE: THE DRIVE TO WORK What if the car catches fire

EXAMPLE:
THE DRIVE TO WORK

What if the car catches fire
Who decides:

Vehicle owner(s)
Control: Emergency response plan & equipment
Decision:

MEDIUM

Cost of loss

Cost of control

$500 - Deductible
Rate increase?
Car down-time
Repair/Replacement hassle

$15 Fire extinguisher

Слайд 49

Step 5 - Risk Control Implementation Process: Leaders lead, operators are

Step 5 - Risk Control Implementation

Process: Leaders lead, operators are involved,

all are accountable.

Output: ORM initiatives always have positive mission impact.

Слайд 50

ORM Implementation Tools & Guidelines Help Controls Click with Operators The

ORM Implementation Tools & Guidelines Help Controls Click with Operators

The

involvement continuum guides the high degree of operator input to ORM actions

The leader involvement actions list and the leader opportunity job aid help assure effective leader influence
The motivation model makes application of modern behavior management techniques easier

Слайд 51

EXAMPLE: THE DRIVE TO WORK What if the car catches fire

EXAMPLE:
THE DRIVE TO WORK

What if the car catches fire
Transfer -

Insurance OPR: Dad
Reduce -
Engineer gas tank OPR: Ford
Drive defensively OPR: Driver
Focused maintenance OPR: Dad
Emergency response plan & equipment OPR: Team Mom & Dad

MEDIUM

Слайд 52

Step 6 - Supervise and Review Process: Progress measured through increased

Step 6 - Supervise and Review

Process: Progress measured through increased mission

effectiveness, mishap results and direct indicators of risk.

Output: ORM performance status determined real time.

Слайд 53

Review and Feedback Procedures Measure & Leverage ORM Results Eliminate invalid

Review and Feedback Procedures Measure & Leverage ORM Results

Eliminate invalid

statistical uses of mishap rates and numbers

Refocus measurement on direct measures of risk (critical behaviors, knowledge, conditions, etc.)
Radically improve the effectiveness of feedback systems through modern data and communications systems

Слайд 54

USING THE 6-STEP PROCESS THE RISK MANAGEMENT CONTINUUM

USING THE 6-STEP PROCESS THE RISK MANAGEMENT CONTINUUM

Слайд 55

USING THE 6-STEP PROCESS LEVELS OF EFFORT Little Time Resources Risk

USING THE 6-STEP PROCESS LEVELS OF EFFORT

Little
Time
Resources
Risk

Lot of
Time
Resources
Risk

TIME CRITICAL DELIBERATE STRATEGIC

SELECTED
PRIMARY

PRIMARY

SPECIALIZED

ADVANCED
Слайд 56

Why integration is critical? 12 Strategies for ORM integration. The importance

Why integration is critical?
12 Strategies for ORM integration.
The importance of pace.

Integrating

the ORM Process

Overview

Слайд 57

WHY INTEGRATION IS CRITICAL? Integration: Forces balancing of loss control and

WHY INTEGRATION IS CRITICAL?

Integration:
Forces balancing of loss control and other

mission needs

Captures more of the knowledge and experience of large numbers of operators
Reduces the number and diversity of references needed to do the job right
Eliminates redundancy and gaps between loss control functions
Strengthens accountability
Reduces costs and workloads (in plans, materiel development cycles, etc.)

Слайд 58

THE TWELVE STRATEGIES FOR PROGRAM INTEGRATION Accountability Teaming Partnership Integrate in

THE TWELVE STRATEGIES FOR PROGRAM INTEGRATION

Accountability
Teaming
Partnership
Integrate in Training
Risk Decision Points
Organization &

Policy Structure

Employee Activities
Process Integration
Direct Change
Gain a Champion
Integrate in Strategic Planning
Integrate into Measurement

Слайд 59

THE IMPORTANCE OF PACE Don’t use the shotgun Don’t get out

THE IMPORTANCE OF PACE

Don’t use the shotgun
Don’t get out in front

of the organization - too far
Don’t “inspect-in” ORM

Do focus on “targets”
Do expect crawl, walk, run
Patience, patience, patience

Слайд 60

USAF ORM MATURATION Vision USAF Approach Background Strategy

USAF ORM MATURATION

Vision
USAF Approach
Background
Strategy

Слайд 61

VISION Macro: Every Leader, Member, & Employee Manages Risk in All

VISION

Macro: Every Leader, Member, & Employee Manages Risk in All They

Do... On- & Off-Duty

Micro:
On-Duty - Every Organization Manages Normal Operational Risk Profile
- Unique Operations Identified & Assessed
Off-Duty - Every Individual Applies Risk Management Process to Activities

Слайд 62

CAP APPROACH Top-Down Approach Strong Senior Leader Backing Decentralized Implementation Moderate

CAP APPROACH

Top-Down Approach

Strong Senior Leader Backing
Decentralized Implementation
Moderate Implementation Tempo
Safety Lead Role

for Cross-Functional Implementation
Слайд 63

ORM STRATEGY Miscellaneous Initiatives Automated “Tools” Doctrine Integration Crosstell NEWS Release(s) Video(s)

ORM STRATEGY Miscellaneous Initiatives

Automated “Tools”
Doctrine Integration
Crosstell
NEWS Release(s)
Video(s)

Слайд 64

The leader’s role will be a decisive factor in the success or failure of ORM

The leader’s role will be a decisive factor in the success

or failure of ORM
Слайд 65

ORM Leadership Opportunities 1. Commit to Breakthrough Improvement Objectives: Put improvement

ORM Leadership Opportunities

1. Commit to Breakthrough Improvement
Objectives: Put improvement of risk

performance (control-opportunity) on a competitive level with other important mission concerns.

2. Set Goals & Objectives
Objectives: Establish periodic ORM performance and programmatic goals.

Слайд 66

ORM Leadership Opportunities Continued 3. Set a Personal Example Objectives: To

ORM Leadership Opportunities Continued

3. Set a Personal Example
Objectives: To assure credibility

of the ORM process through personal behavior.

4. Build an Aggressive Opportunity Mindset in the Organization
Objectives: Create an organization as conscious of the opportunity aspects of ORM as it is the risk reduction

Слайд 67

ORM Leadership Opportunities Continued 5. Induce Loss Control Community Functional Integration

ORM Leadership Opportunities Continued

5. Induce Loss Control Community Functional Integration
Objectives: Build

increasing cooperation and integration of the loss control community

6. Establish an ORM Management Structure
Objectives: Provide the necessary leadership and staff resources to adequately guide the ORM process

Слайд 68

ORM Leadership Opportunities Continued 7. Resource ORM Activities Objectives: Allocate resources

ORM Leadership Opportunities Continued

7. Resource ORM Activities
Objectives: Allocate resources to ORM

(control-opportunity) at a level it can competitively justify

8. Heat Shield Subordinates
Objectives: Protect subordinates who have taken prudent, mission supportive risks, but experienced severe losses, from negative consequences.

Слайд 69

ORM Leadership Opportunities Continued 9. Detect & Correct Gambling Objectives: Develop

ORM Leadership Opportunities Continued

9. Detect & Correct Gambling
Objectives: Develop an organization

in which risk “gambling” is deterred even when the gambler “wins”.

10. Use the Power of Question
Objectives: Use pointed ORM questions to induce ORM activity and culture change.

Слайд 70

ORM Leadership Opportunities Continued 11. Regularly Monitor ORM Progress Objectives: Periodically

ORM Leadership Opportunities Continued

11. Regularly Monitor ORM Progress
Objectives: Periodically assess a

set of data that effectively monitors organization ORM status

12. Exploit the ORM Value of Major Mishap Reviews
Objectives: Consistently induce consideration of the ORM implications of mishaps

Слайд 71

3 Definition Basel II – Operational risk is the risk of

3

Definition

Basel II – Operational risk is the risk of loss resulting
from

inadequate or failed internal processes, people
and systems, or from external events. This
definition includes legal risk, but excludes strategic
and reputation risk.
Слайд 72

4 Definition Who are these people? What does this have to do with us?

4

Definition

Who are these people?

What does this have to do with us?

Слайд 73

5 Definition Basel Committee on Banking Supervision – Committee of banking

5

Definition

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision –
Committee of banking supervisory authorities that
provides

a forum for cooperation on bank
supervisory matters and encourages convergence
towards common approaches and standards. It also
frames guidelines and standards for banks and bank
supervisors.

Basel Accords – Recommendations on banking laws
and regulation

Слайд 74

6 Definition Basel II was intended to create an international standard

6

Definition

Basel II was intended to create an international
standard for banking regulators

to control how much
capital banks need to put aside to guard against the
types of financial and operational risks banks face.

Basel II lists three types of risk:

Credit risk

Market risk
Operational risk

What about liquidity risk?

Слайд 75

7 Definition Market liquidity is the risk that a security can

7

Definition

Market liquidity is the risk that a security can not be
sold

at all or quickly enough to prevent a loss.

Market liquidity risk is a type of market risk. It is
addressed in Basel III.

Funding liquidity risk is the risk that liabilities can not
be met when due.

Funding liquidity risk is an operational risk.

Слайд 76

8 Definition Solvency II codifies and harmonizes EU insurance regulation. Solvency

8

Definition

Solvency II codifies and harmonizes EU insurance
regulation.

Solvency II definition - Operational

risk means the
risk of loss arising from inadequate or failed internal
processes, personnel or systems, or from external
events. [It] shall include legal risks, and exclude
risks arising from strategic decisions, as well as
reputation.
Слайд 77

9 Definition Legal risk - risk of loss due to legal

9

Definition

Legal risk - risk of loss due to legal actions or
uncertainty

in the applicability or interpretation of
contracts, laws, or regulations. Included.

Strategic risk – risk arising from decisions
concerning a company’s direction. Excluded.

Reputational risk - risk related to the trustworthiness
of the company. Excluded.

Слайд 78

10 Definition Better definition - Operational risk is the risk arising

10

Definition

Better definition - Operational risk is the risk arising
from execution of

a company’s business function.

This focuses on the risks arising from people,
processes, and systems.

Note that it includes external events that affect a
company’s operations.

Слайд 79

11 Definition Operational risk does not include strategic risk – the

11

Definition

Operational risk does not include strategic risk – the
risk that arises

from decisions concerning a
company’s objectives.

Reputational risk may arise from operational risk but
is not, in and of itself, an operational risk. It also can
arise from credit risk, market risk, and strategic risk.

Operational risk is not used to generate profit,
whereas market risk, credit risk, and strategic risk can
do so.

Слайд 80

12 Types of Operational Risk Basel II List Internal fraud –

12

Types of Operational Risk

Basel II List

Internal fraud – misappropriation of assets,

tax evasion, intentional mismarking of
positions, bribery

External fraud – theft of information, hacking damage, third party theft and forgery

Employment practices and workplace safety – discrimination, workers’ compensation,
employee health and safety

Clients, products, and business practice – market manipulation, antitrust, improper
trade, product defects, fiduciary breaches, account churning

Damage to physical assets – natural disasters, terrorism, vandalism

Business disruption and system failures – utility disruptions, software failures,
hardware failures

Executive, delivery, and process management – data entry errors, accounting errors,
failed mandatory reporting, negligent loss of client assets

Legal risk is in several of these categories.

Слайд 81

13 Types of Operational Risk Operational risk losses usually are idiosyncratic

13

Types of Operational Risk

Operational risk losses usually are idiosyncratic to a
particular

institution.

Operational risk losses most commonly are from a
failure of internal controls.

Internal operational risk losses arise from errors and
ineffective operations.

Слайд 82

14 Operational Risk Management Framework Basel II Risk organizational and governance

14

Operational Risk Management Framework

Basel II

Risk organizational and governance structure

Policies, procedures and

processes

Systems used by a bank in identifying, measuring,
monitoring, controlling and mitigating operational risk

Operational risk measurement system (ORMS) –
systems and data used to measure operational risk
to estimate the operational risk charge

Слайд 83

15 Operational Risk Management Framework Enterprise Risk Management Steps 1. Identify

15

Operational Risk Management Framework

Enterprise Risk Management Steps

1. Identify risks

2. Describe and/or

quantify risks

3. Decide how to mitigate risks

4. Implement decisions

5. Monitor results of decisions and make changes as
needed

Communication is key.

Слайд 84

16 Operational Risk Management Framework Basel II differentiates between verification and

16

Operational Risk Management Framework

Basel II differentiates between verification and
validation.

Verification tests the

effectiveness of the overall
ORMF and tests ORMS validation processes to
ensure they are independent and implemented
consistent with bank policies.

Validation ensures that the ORMS is sufficiently
robust and provides assurance of the integrity of
inputs, assumptions, processes, and outputs.

Слайд 85

17 Operational Risk Management Framework Essential elements for verification and validation:

17

Operational Risk Management Framework

Essential elements for verification and validation:

Independence

Capacity – adequately

staffed with adequate
resources

Professional competence and due diligence

Слайд 86

18 Quantification Basel Committee on Banking Supervision “Operational Risk – Supervisory

18

Quantification

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision “Operational Risk – Supervisory
Guidelines for the

Advanced Measurement Approaches” June 2011

Operational risk data categories for Advanced
Measurement Approaches:

Internal loss data (ILD)

External data (ED)

Scenario analysis (SA)

Business environment and internal controls

factors (BEICF)

Слайд 87

19 Quantification It all starts with scenarios. Ask “What if…?” Don’t

19

Quantification

It all starts with scenarios.

Ask “What if…?”

Don’t know what internal and

external data to collect
unless you have some idea of what scenarios
you need to look at.

Data includes qualitative as well as quantitative.

Qualitative data sometimes is more important than
quantitative, particularly when there are recent
changes.

Слайд 88

20 Quantification Internal Loss Data (ILD) Internal to the organization Used

20

Quantification

Internal Loss Data (ILD)

Internal to the organization

Used to estimate loss frequencies

Used

to inform the severity distribution(s)

Serves as input into the scenario analysis

Слайд 89

21 Quantification External Data (ED) External to the organization Used to

21

Quantification

External Data (ED)

External to the organization

Used to estimate loss severity, particularly

for the tail

May be from a consortium of like members

(Association of British Insurers’ Operational Risk
Consortium – www.abioric.com)

Слайд 90

22 Quantification Scenario Analysis (SA) Scenario outputs form part of the

22

Quantification

Scenario Analysis (SA)

Scenario outputs form part of the input into the
Advanced

Measurement Approach model

Qualitative

Produce range of results

Quantify uncertainty arising from scenario biases –
This is a significant challenge.

Слайд 91

23 Quantification Business Environment and Internal Controls Factors (BEICF) Highly subjective

23

Quantification

Business Environment and Internal Controls Factors
(BEICF)

Highly subjective

Often used as indirect input

into the quantification
framework

Often used as an ex post adjustment to model
output

Слайд 92

24 Mitigation Goals Have business continuity Mitigate financial loss Reduce reputational risk

24

Mitigation

Goals

Have business continuity

Mitigate financial loss

Reduce reputational risk

Слайд 93

25 Mitigation The size of loss a company is willing to

25

Mitigation

The size of loss a company is willing to accept
compared to

the cost of correcting errors or
improving operations determines its operational
risk appetite.

Most effective means of reducing operational risk
are sound policies, practices, and procedures for
internal events and insurance for external and
some internal events.

Слайд 94

26 Mitigation Low frequency, low severity – may do nothing. Low

26

Mitigation

Low frequency, low severity – may do nothing.

Low frequency, high severity

– analyze by scenario testing.
Handled by planning for these in advance and/or by financing
risk such as by purchasing insurance.

High frequency, low severity – may do nothing. However
these can accumulate to the point where the severity
becomes larger, such as if it triggers a loss of reputation.

High frequency, high severity – take risk control measures.
May finance risk such as by purchasing insurance.

Слайд 95

27 Mitigation Insurance companies sell products that mitigate others’ operational risks.

27

Mitigation

Insurance companies sell products that mitigate
others’ operational risks.

Слайд 96

28 Mitigation Basel Committee on Banking Supervision - “Principles for the

28

Mitigation

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision - “Principles for the Sound
Management of

Operational Risk” June 2011

Internal controls embedded in day-to-day operations
are designed to ensure to the extent possible
that:

Activities are efficient and effective

Information is reliable, timely and complete

The entity is compliant with applicable laws

and regulation.

Слайд 97

29 Mitigation Three lines of defense: Business line management An independent

29

Mitigation

Three lines of defense:

Business line management

An independent corporate operational risk

management function

An

independent review
Слайд 98

30 Monitoring Key Performance Indicator (KPI) – Are we achieving our

30

Monitoring

Key Performance Indicator (KPI) – Are we
achieving our desired level of

performance?

Key Risk Indicators (KRI) – How is our risk profile
changing and is it within our desired tolerance
levels?

Key Control Indicators (KCI) – Are our
organization’s internal controls effective?

Слайд 99

31 Risk Identification and Mitigation Examples Fine Dining Restaurant Family owned

31

Risk Identification and Mitigation Examples

Fine Dining Restaurant

Family owned
Open only for dinner

Monday through Saturday
Seats 80 at a time for two seatings a night
Private party room upstairs
Owner is one of the managers on duty but is also a chef
Has a general manager and one other manager on duty
Has two part-time office staff and one cleaner
Has an Executive Chef, two Line Chefs, one Dessert Chef
Has two expediters and two dishwashers
Has three captains, six waiters, six bussers, and one bartender
Has one hostess and one coat checker
Subcontracts car parking
Слайд 100

32 Risk Identification and Mitigation Examples Fine Dining Restaurant Internal policies,

32

Risk Identification and Mitigation Examples

Fine Dining Restaurant

Internal policies, practices, and procedures

What

can go wrong in the front of the house?
What can go wrong in the kitchen?
What can go wrong in the office?
What can go wrong elsewhere?

What communication problems can there be?

External events

What could negatively affect the restaurant?

Слайд 101

33 Risk Identification and Mitigation Examples Large Taxi Company In major

33

Risk Identification and Mitigation Examples

Large Taxi Company

In major city
Owned by one

private investor
No Board of Directors
One garage location
Owns 500 cabs
Has 1,000 drivers
Has 20 mechanics in own repair shop
Has own gas station and car wash
Has 5 dispatchers
Has 10 office staff including CEO, COO, and CFO positions
Слайд 102

34 Risk Identification and Mitigation Examples Large Taxi Company Internal policies,

34

Risk Identification and Mitigation Examples

Large Taxi Company

Internal policies, practices, and procedures

What

can go wrong on the streets?

What can go wrong in the repair shop?
What can go wrong with the gas station and car wash?
What can go wrong with dispatching?
What can go wrong in the office?
What can go wrong elsewhere?

What communication problems can there be?

External events

What could negatively affect the company?

Слайд 103

35 Risk Identification and Mitigation Examples Insurance Company Privately held Much

35

Risk Identification and Mitigation Examples

Insurance Company

Privately held
Much of board is family

members
Writes automobile liability and physical damage for taxis in

large city
Recently had large business expansion
Is moving from low-tech to high-tech back office
Uses independent agents to write business

Слайд 104

36 Risk Identification and Mitigation Examples Insurance Company Internal policies, practices,

36

Risk Identification and Mitigation Examples

Insurance Company

Internal policies, practices, and procedures

What can

go wrong with the agents?
What can go wrong with customer service?
What can go wrong with underwriting?
What can go wrong with claim handling?
What can go wrong with data processing?

Increased inefficiency due to data overload

Compliance risk if data not protected
Privacy risk

Security risk

Слайд 105

37 Risk Identification and Mitigation Examples Insurance Company Internal policies, practices,

37

Risk Identification and Mitigation Examples

Insurance Company

Internal policies, practices, and procedures
(continued)

What can

go wrong with accounting?

What can go wrong with investing?

What can go wrong with reinsurance?

What can go wrong with the Board of Directors?

What can to wrong with the owners?

What can go wrong elsewhere?

What communication problems can there be?

External events

What could negatively affect the company?

Слайд 106

38 Risk Identification and Mitigation Examples Insurance Company Operational risk losses

38

Risk Identification and Mitigation Examples

Insurance Company

Operational risk losses usually are idiosyncratic

to a
particular institution.

Very highly automated back-office systems –
exposure to IT operational risks

Low tech back office – exposure to people and
process operational risks

Слайд 107

39 Words of Wisdom Strategic decisions affect operations. Have an “open

39

Words of Wisdom

Strategic decisions affect operations.

Have an “open door” policy.

Manage by

walking around.

“Good reason” versus “real reasons.”

When someone presents a problem, they must also
present a possible solution or be willing to
participate in finding a solution.

Слайд 108

40 Words of Wisdom Some processes need to be “hard-wired” in:

40

Words of Wisdom

Some processes need to be “hard-wired” in: no
exceptions.

Manage by

exception. Use those to improve
processes and systems.

Allow people to make exceptions that are in the
company’s long-term best interest.

Cross train.

Слайд 109

41 Words of Wisdom Be aware of what is going on

41

Words of Wisdom

Be aware of what is going on outside the

company:

Clients/customers
Service providers
Competitors
Related industries
General population –

demographics, work

environments, socially
Technology innovation
Accounting standards
Politically
Judicially
Legislatively
With the country
With the world in general

in general

Слайд 110

42 Words of Wisdom Be more proactive than reactive. Keep an

42

Words of Wisdom

Be more proactive than reactive.

Keep an open mind.

See what

is really there.

Be prepared.

Be flexible.

Communicate, communicate, communicate.