Introduction to comparative politics. Social movements

Содержание

Слайд 2

Political attitudes Usually described according the right-left continuum. Pace and scope

Political attitudes

Usually described according the right-left continuum.
Pace and scope of

political change in the balance of freedom and equality.
In modern societies, they also concern social issues: marriage, abortion, social care, immigration.
Transmitted through political parties, the society, the family.
Слайд 3

Left vs Right wing political views The fundamental differences centered around

Left vs Right wing political views

The fundamental differences centered around the

rights of individuals vs. the power of the government.
They tend to have opposite views on social affairs too.
Left-wing beliefs (liberal) favor an expanded role for the government to insure the welfare of the people.
Right-wing beliefs (conservative) favor a limited role for the government to insure individual rights and civil liberties. Yet, often not on social issues.
Слайд 4

Take the test!

Take the test!

Слайд 5

Right vs Left

Right vs Left

Слайд 6

For a larger version, click on this link.

For a larger version, click on this link.

Слайд 7

Political culture Societies’ norms for political activity. Modernization theory predicts that

Political culture

Societies’ norms for political activity.
Modernization theory predicts that cultures change

with economic development → secular societies.
Counter-examples?
Does globalization lead to the liberalization of cultures around the world?
Changes greatly over time.
Ex: Egypt, conservatism in the US, LGBTQ rights etc.
Слайд 8

Social movements An organized effort by a large number of people

Social movements

An organized effort by a large number of people to

bring about or impede social change.
Differ in size but collective.
Based on shared beliefs and solidarity, which mobilize about conflictual issues, trough the frequent use of various forms of mobilization.
The collective challenges nourish sustained interactions with elites, opponents, and authorities.
Are different from political parties or interest groups in that they are not as hierarchic or bureaucratic.
Слайд 9

Social movements Contentious politics outside of parliaments. Contentious politics is the

Social movements

Contentious politics outside of parliaments.
Contentious politics is the use of disruptive

techniques to make a political point, or to change government policy.
A movement is not necessarily an organization.
Ex: Occupy Wall Street has no leadership.
But organizations may be parts of a social movement.
Слайд 10

Examples of social movements Suffragettes. Arab Spring. Occupy Wall Street. People

Examples of social movements

Suffragettes.
Arab Spring.
Occupy Wall Street.
People for the Ethical Treatment

of Animals (PETA).
The anti-globalization movement.
Examples from KZ?
Слайд 11

Factors that contribute to collective behavior Structural factors that increase the

Factors that contribute to collective behavior

Structural factors that increase the

chances of people responding in a particular way.
Breakdown in social control mechanisms and corresponding feeling of normlessness.
Ex: state-building, wars (WW2, Vietnam), political isolation (Apartheid).
Слайд 12

Emergence The better the movements’ symbols, networks resources, the easier it

Emergence

The better the movements’ symbols, networks resources, the easier it will

be to exploit even modest opportunities.
When successful, movements create opportunities for other movements, which can also borrow repertoires of contention from unrelated movements.
Слайд 13

Repertoires of contention Set of various protest-related tools and actions available

Repertoires of contention

Set of various protest-related tools and actions available to

a movement or related organization in a given time frame.
Petitions.
Gatherings.
Demonstrations.
Riots.
Repeated use of the same repertoire diminishes its instrumental effectiveness and thus encourages tactical innovation.
The reason for the escalation and radicalization of tactics in many movement campaigns, condemning them to be successfully painted as "extremist" by their opponents and by the media.
Слайд 14

These groups might be attempting to create change (Occupy Wall Street,

These groups might be attempting to create change (Occupy Wall Street,

Arab Spring).
To resist change (anti-globalization movement, Manif pour tous).
To provide a political voice to those otherwise disenfranchised (civil rights movements).

Social movements create social change

Слайд 15

Other aims Many also tend to emphasize social changes in lifestyle

Other aims

Many also tend to emphasize social changes in lifestyle instead

of specific changes in public policy or for economic change.
Ex: the Slow Food movement is in opposition to the fast-food lifestyle that is found unhealthy and unsustainable.
Слайд 16

Are social movements left or right wing? Tendency to see them

Are social movements left or right wing?

Tendency to see them as

left wings.
Maybe because left-wing groups are more active?
They may be radical or conservative, highly organized or very diffused, they are all examples of social movements.
Manif pour tous, Tea Party, Pro-Life movements, Westboro Baptist Church.
Слайд 17

Westboro Baptist Church

Westboro Baptist Church

Слайд 18

Social Movement Theories Relative Deprivation People compare achievements, become discontent and

Social Movement Theories

Relative Deprivation
People compare achievements, become discontent and join

social movements to get their “fair share”.
Resource Mobilization
People participate in social movements when the movement has access to key resources.
New Social Movement
he focus is on sources of social movements, including politics, ideology, and culture. Race, class, gender, sexuality, and other sources of identity are also factors in movements such as ecofeminism and environmental justice.
Social Construction Theory:
Used to determine how people assign meaning to activities and processes in social movements.
New Social Movement T
Слайд 19

Four stages of SM 1- Emergence Individualized, but widespread feelings of

Four stages of SM 1- Emergence

Individualized, but widespread feelings of discontent and

windows of opportunity.
Movements in this stage lack clearly defined strategy for achieving goals and little organization.
Слайд 20

2- Coalescence The coming together of social movement constituents. This stage

2- Coalescence

The coming together of social movement constituents. This stage is

marked by demonstrations and formulation of strategy.
Слайд 21

3- Co-optation This occurs when movement leaders are offered rewards by

3- Co-optation

This occurs when movement leaders are offered rewards by the

movement’s opponents in order divert movement pressure.
For example, leaders can either be “paid off” or given a job by the movement’s target so as to divert leadership.
Слайд 22

3- Bureaucratization Strategies are carried out by formal organizations and trained staff. Also known as formalization.

3- Bureaucratization

Strategies are carried out by formal organizations and trained staff.

Also known as formalization.
Слайд 23

4- Decline The end of mass mobilization. Decline can occur in

4- Decline

The end of mass mobilization. Decline can occur in five

ways repression, co-optation, success, and failure, and establishment within the mainstream.
Слайд 24

SM need 1- organization 2- leadership 3-resouces

SM need

1- organization
2- leadership
3-resouces

Слайд 25

Impact of technology Social media has the potential to dramatically transform

Impact of technology

Social media has the potential to dramatically transform how

people get involved. 
The ability to organize without regard to geographical boundaries becomes possible using social media.
https://opentextbc.ca/introductiontosociology/chapter/chapter21-social-movements-and-social-change/
Слайд 26

Rather than increasing engagement, he contends that social media only increases

Rather than increasing engagement, he contends that social media only increases

participation; after all, the cost of participation is so much lower than the cost of engagement.