Metaphor and Metonymy

Содержание

Слайд 2

Required readings: Yu, N. (2003). Chinese metaphors of thinking. Cognitive Linguistics,

Required readings:
Yu, N. (2003). Chinese metaphors of thinking. Cognitive Linguistics, 14(2/3),

141–165
Huang, S. F. (1994). Chinese as a Metonymic Language. In Mathew Y. Chen and Ovid J.-L.. Tzeng. (eds.), In Honor of William S-Y. Wang. Interdisciplinary Studies on Language and Language Change. 223-252. Taipei: Pyramid.
Recommended readings:
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chapter 1: Concepts we live by. pp. 3-6; chapter 8: Metonymy. pp. 35-40; Chapter 12: How is our conceptual system grounded? pp. 56-60.
Grady, J. E., Oakley, T., & Coulson, S. (1999). Blending and Metaphor. In G. Steen & R. Gibbs (eds.), Metaphor in cognitive linguistics, pp.101–124. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Слайд 3

Our concepts structure what we see, how we get around the

Our concepts structure what we see, how we get around the

world, and how we relate to other people.
Our conceptual system thus plays a central role in defining our everyday realities.

According to Lakoff & Johnson (1980)

Слайд 4

According to Lakoff & Johnson (1980) Our conceptual system is not

According to Lakoff & Johnson (1980)

Our conceptual system is not something

we are normally aware of.
Слайд 5

Since communication is based on the same conceptual system that we

Since communication is based on the same conceptual system that we

use in thinking and acting, language is an important source of evidence for what that system is like.

According to Lakoff & Johnson (1980)

Слайд 6

Conceptual System - Metaphorical in Nature Primarily on the basis of

Conceptual System - Metaphorical in Nature
Primarily on the basis of linguistic

evidence, we have found that most of our ordinary conceptual system is metaphorical in nature.

According to Lakoff & Johnson (1980)

Слайд 7

Metaphor A metaphor is the expression of an understanding of one

Metaphor

A metaphor is the expression of an understanding of one concept

in terms of another concept, where there is some similarity or correlation between the two.
A metaphor is the understanding itself of one concept in terms of another.
Слайд 8

The Concept of ARGUMENT and the Conceptual Metaphor ARGUMENT IS WAR

The Concept of ARGUMENT
and
the Conceptual Metaphor ARGUMENT IS WAR

Слайд 9

Examples of A Verbal Battle: Your claims are indefensible. He attacked

Examples of A Verbal Battle:
Your claims are indefensible.
He attacked every weak

point in my argument.
His criticisms were right on target.
I demolished his argument.
I’ve never won an argument with him.
You disagree? Okay, shoot!
If you use that strategy, he’ll wipe you out.
He shot down all of my arguments.
(Lakoff & Johnson, 1980)
Слайд 10

We talk about arguments that way because we conceive of them

We talk about arguments that way because we conceive of them

that way – and we act according to the way we conceive of things.
The essence of metaphor is understanding and experiencing one kind of thing in terms of another.

According to Lakoff & Johnson (1980)

Слайд 11

The concept is metaphorically structured The activity is metaphorically structured Consequently,

The concept is metaphorically structured
The activity is metaphorically structured
Consequently, the language

is metaphorically structured

According to Lakoff & Johnson (1980)

Слайд 12

Metaphor is not just a matter of language, that is, of

Metaphor is not just a matter of language, that is, of

mere words.
Human thought processes are largely metaphorical.
The human conceptual system is metaphorically structured and defined.

According to Lakoff & Johnson (1980)

Слайд 13

The metaphorical concept is systematic The language we use to talk

The metaphorical concept is systematic
The language we use to talk about

that aspect of concept is systematic
Thus, we can use metaphorical linguistic expressions to study the nature of metaphorical concepts and to gain an understanding of the metaphorical nature of our activities.

The Systematicity of Metaphorical Concepts

Слайд 14

Chinese Metaphors of Thinking Yu, N. (2003: 141-165) Thinking is Object

Chinese Metaphors of Thinking Yu, N. (2003: 141-165)

Thinking is Object Manipulation
思想交流
思想火花
抛在脑后
挖空心思
思想包袱
思想疙瘩
旧思想的束缚

谷子

Слайд 15

Acquiring Ideas is Eating 精神食粮 陈腐观念 陈糠烂谷子 馊主意 如饥似渴 囫囵吐枣 搜肠刮肚

Acquiring Ideas is Eating

精神食粮
陈腐观念
陈糠烂谷子
馊主意
如饥似渴
囫囵吐枣
搜肠刮肚

Слайд 16

Thinking is Moving 思路 想到 想通 想出 想开

Thinking is Moving

思路
想到
想通
想出
想开

Слайд 17

Examples 门外一阵喧哗打断了她的思路。 她忽然 想到一件重要的事情。 只要相通了, 他就会积极地 去干 。 她想出一条妙计。 想开点,别生气了。 她遭人遗弃,一时想不开就自杀了。 。

Examples

门外一阵喧哗打断了她的思路。
她忽然 想到一件重要的事情。
只要相通了, 他就会积极地 去干 。
她想出一条妙计。
想开点,别生气了。
她遭人遗弃,一时想不开就自杀了。


Слайд 18

Successful thinking takes a correct direction 晕头转向 这道算题真难,把我搞得晕头转向。 拐弯 他思想一时还拐不过弯来。

Successful thinking takes a correct direction

晕头转向
这道算题真难,把我搞得晕头转向。
拐弯
他思想一时还拐不过弯来。

Слайд 19

Make a turn in thinking in order to ‘get back to

Make a turn in thinking in order to ‘get back

to the right track”
反思
反省

“Go back”
追思
追想
追溯
追还
追念
追忆
追悔

Слайд 20

One’s thinking can “travel” or “wander” very far and deep 深谋远虑

One’s thinking can “travel” or “wander” very far and deep
深谋远虑
思深虑远
遐想
遐思
满天的繁星会引起人们无边无际的遐想。

“Hard thinking”

entails “movement”
想来想去
我想来想去还是认为自己没有错。
左思右想
她躺在床上左思右想,一夜没合眼。
前思后想
Слайд 21

“back and forth movement” 进退两难 左右为难 我想去看她,可是不是时候,不去吧,又不放心。真是左右为难。

“back and forth movement”
进退两难
左右为难
我想去看她,可是不是时候,不去吧,又不放心。真是左右为难。

Слайд 22

Thinking as Seeing 看 看法 我 看他是个可靠的人。 你对这件事怎么看? 我们应该全面地看问题。 你们应该看清形式。 你们必须从实质上看。

Thinking as Seeing


看法
我 看他是个可靠的人。
你对这件事怎么看?
我们应该全面地看问题。
你们应该看清形式。
你们必须从实质上看。
他把人民的利益看得高于一切。

看穿
看透
看破
看开
看扁
看底
小看

Слайд 23

In the mental domain 见 见解 短见 高见 管见 偏见 浅见

In the mental domain


见解
短见
高见
管见
偏见
浅见
远见
灼见
卓见


观点
观念
悲观
乐观
客观
主观
人生观
世界观

Mental activities

傲视
鄙视
歧视
忽视
正视
轻视
重视
珍视



Слайд 24

“Turn around and look back: when recalling the past 回首 回眸

“Turn around and look back: when recalling the past
回首
回眸
回溯
回忆
回想
回念
回思

Seeing is conceptualized

as the ‘eye light” traveling from the eyes to the target
目光短浅
目光远大
目光如炬
Farsighted or farseeing
高瞻远瞩
站得高,看得远

Light helps
明白
明亮
模糊
朦胧

Слайд 25

Thinking in the Heart or Mind 心事 心思 心想 心算 心口如一 心想事成 眼不见,心不烦 老心者治人,劳力者治于人

Thinking in the Heart or Mind

心事
心思
心想
心算
心口如一
心想事成
眼不见,心不烦
老心者治人,劳力者治于人

Слайд 26

Metaphorical concepts reflected in contemporary English example: TIME IS MONEY


Metaphorical concepts reflected in contemporary English
example:
TIME IS MONEY

Слайд 27

You’re wasting my time. This gadget will save your hours. I

You’re wasting my time.
This gadget will save your hours.
I don’t have

the time to give you.
How do you spend your time these days?
That flat tire cost me an hour.
I’ve invested a lot of time in her.
I don’t have enough time to spare for that.
You’re running out of time.
You need to budget your time.
Put aside some time for ping pong.
Is that worth your while?
Do you have much time left?
He’s living on borrowed time.
You don’t use your time profitably.
I lost a lot of time when I got sick.
Thank you for your time.
(Lakoff & Johnson, 1980)
Слайд 28

In modern Western culture, time is money, time is a limited

In modern Western culture,
time is money,
time is a limited

resource,
and time is a valuable commodity.
This isn’t a necessary way for human beings to conceptualize time; it is tied to western culture.
There are cultures where time is non of these things.
Слайд 29

An entailment relationship There is subcategorization within this single system. These

An entailment relationship
There is subcategorization within this single system.
These subcategorization relationships

characterize entailment relationships between the metaphors .
TIME IS MONEY TIME IS A LIMITED RESOURCE TIME IS A VALUABLE COMMODITY.
Слайд 30

Metaphorical entailments can characterize a coherent system of metaphorical concepts and

Metaphorical entailments can characterize a coherent system of metaphorical concepts and

a corresponding coherent system of metaphorical expressions for those concepts.
e.g. TIME IS
Money -> spend, invest, budget, profitably, cost
Resources -> use, use up, have enough of, run out of
Commodities -> have, give, lose, thank you for
Слайд 31

Metonymy - Using one entity to refer to another that is related to it.

Metonymy
-
Using one entity to refer to another that is related

to it.
Слайд 32

The primary function of Metaphor is understanding According to Bernhard Debatin

The primary function of Metaphor is understanding
According to Bernhard Debatin (1995:

381) the fundamental function of metaphor is that of rational anticipation that comes from three basic functions
the creative-cognitive
the normative and world-disclosing
the communicative-evocative functions
Metonymy has primarily a referential function
It allows one to use one entity to stand for another
It serves the function of providing understanding.

Functions of Metaphor and Metonymy

Слайд 33

Metonymy -> THE PART FOR THE WHOLE There are many parts

Metonymy
-> THE PART FOR THE WHOLE
There are many parts that

can stand for the whole
Which part we pick out determines which aspect of the whole we are focusing on
Слайд 34

e.g. We need some good heads on the projects (good heads

e.g.
We need some good heads on the projects
(good heads

= intelligent people)
head ->intelligent part of the body
The Times hasn’t arrived at the press conference yet.
(The Times = the reporter from the Times)
The Times -> the importance of the institution the reporter represents
Слайд 35

Metonymy -> THE PART FOR THE WHOLE -> THE FACE FOR

Metonymy
-> THE PART FOR THE WHOLE
-> THE FACE FOR THE

PERSON
She’s just a pretty face.
There are an awful lot of faces out there in the audience.
We need some new faces around here.
Слайд 36

Metonymies are not random or arbitrary occurrences Metonymic concepts are also

Metonymies are not random or arbitrary occurrences
Metonymic concepts are also

systematic
They are instances of certain general metonymic concepts in terms of which we organize our thoughts and actions.
Metonymic concepts allow us to conceptualize one thing by means of its relation to something else
Слайд 37

e.g. THE PART FOR THE WHOLE We don’ hire longhairs. PRODUCER

e.g.
THE PART FOR THE WHOLE
We don’ hire longhairs.
PRODUCER FOR PRODUCT
He bought

a Ford.
OBJECT USED FOR USER
The buses are on strike
CONTROLLER FOR CONTROLLED
Nixon bombed Hanoi
INSTITUTION FOR PEOPLE RESPONSIBLE
You will never get the university to agree to that.
Слайд 38

Thus, like metaphors, metonymic concepts structure not just our language but

Thus, like metaphors, metonymic concepts structure not just our language but

our thoughts, attitudes, and actions
Like metaphoric concepts, metonymic concepts are grounded in our experience.
Слайд 39

The grounding of metonymic concepts is in general more obvious than

The grounding of metonymic concepts is in general more obvious than

is the case with metaphorical concepts.
It usually involves direct physical or causal association.
Слайд 40

How Is Our Conceptual System Grounded? e.g. Concepts that are understood directly

How Is Our Conceptual System Grounded?
e.g.
Concepts that are understood directly

Слайд 41

The structure of our spatial concepts emerges from our constant spatial

The structure of our spatial concepts emerges from our constant spatial

experience – our interaction with the physical environment
Concepts that emerge in this way are concepts that we live by in the most fundamental way

Spatial concepts

Слайд 42

Every experience takes place within a vast background of cultural presuppositions.

Every experience takes place within a vast background of cultural presuppositions.
We

experience our “world” in such a way that our culture is already present in the very experience itself.
Слайд 43

UP-DOWN, IN-OUT, FRONT-BACK, LIGHT-DARK, WARM-COLD, MALE-FEMALE, etc. Such a sharply delineated

UP-DOWN, IN-OUT, FRONT-BACK, LIGHT-DARK, WARM-COLD, MALE-FEMALE, etc.
Such a sharply delineated conceptual

structure for space emerges from our perceptual-motor functioning

Concepts in terms of our body functions

Слайд 44

We typically conceptualize the nonphysical in terms of the physical –

We typically conceptualize the nonphysical in terms of the physical –

that is, we conceptualize the less clearly delineated in terms of the more clearly delineated.

Grounding for our conceptual system