Guidelines in Rheumatology

Содержание

Слайд 2

Genetic Predisposition for Development of Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) AS and HLA-B27

Genetic Predisposition for Development of Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS)

AS and HLA-B27 –

strong association
Ethnic and racial variability in presence and expression of HLA-B27
Слайд 3

Natural History of AS Highly variable Early stages: spontaneous remissions and

Natural History of AS

Highly variable
Early stages: spontaneous remissions and exacerbations
Spectrum of

severity
Mild with limited sacroiliac or lumbar joint involvement to severe, debilitating disease
“Pre-spondylitic” phase – unrecognized period of progressive structural damage over a 5-to-10-year period
Average delay in diagnosis is 8.9 years
Слайд 4

Burden of Illness Functional disability Potential complications Quality-of-life issues Pain, stiffness,

Burden of Illness

Functional disability
Potential complications
Quality-of-life issues
Pain, stiffness, fatigue, sleep problems
Healthcare costs

= $6720 annually
75% indirect medical costs
Missed workdays
Limited-activity days
Слайд 5

Obstacles to Desirable Outcomes in AS Until Recently Diagnostic and classification

Obstacles to Desirable Outcomes in AS Until Recently

Diagnostic and classification limitations
Lack

of universally accepted instruments to assess AS
Until recently, limited treatment options
NSAIDs, COX-2 inhibitors, DMARDs
Mostly symptomatic relief only
Minimal impact on natural course of disease
Слайд 6

Advances in Medicine: Hope for Patients With AS Increased understanding of

Advances in Medicine: Hope for Patients With AS

Increased understanding of pathophysiologic processes


Advent of Anti-TNF agents
International meetings by ASAS (ASsessment in AS working group) to address need for universal standards
Development of ASAS guidelines
US modifications to the ASAS International Guidelines to meet realities of clinical practice in the United States
Слайд 7

Pathogenesis of AS Incompletely understood, but knowledge increasing Interaction between HLA-B27

Pathogenesis of AS

Incompletely understood, but knowledge increasing
Interaction between HLA-B27 and T-cell

response
Increased concentration of T-cells, macrophages, and proinflammatory cytokines
Role of TNF
Inflammatory reactions ? produce hallmarks of disease
Слайд 8

Clinical Features of AS

Clinical Features of AS

Слайд 9

Modified New York Criteria for the Diagnosis of AS Clinical Criteria

Modified New York Criteria for the Diagnosis of AS

Clinical Criteria
Low back

pain, > 3 months, improved by exercise, not relieved by rest
Limitation of lumbar spine motion, sagittal and frontal planes
Limitation of chest expansion relative to normal values for age and sex

Radiologic Criteria
Sacroiliitis grade ≥ 2 bilaterally or grade 3 – 4 unilaterally
Grading
Definite AS if radiologic criterion present plus at least one clinical criteria
Probable AS if:
Three clinical criterion
Radiologic criterion present, but no signs or symptoms satisfy clinical criteria

Слайд 10

Disease Activity Assessment BASFI = Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index BASDAI

Disease Activity Assessment

BASFI = Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index
BASDAI = Bath

Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index
ASAS - IC = ASsessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis Improvement Criteria
Слайд 11

Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) Visual analog scale (VAS) –

Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI)

Visual analog scale (VAS) – 10

cm
Mean score of 10 questions
Questions level of functional disability, including:
Ability to bend at the waist and perform tasks
Looking over your shoulder without turning your body
Standing unsupported for 10 minutes without discomfort
Rising from a seated position without the use of an aid
Exercising and performing strenuous activity
Performing daily activities of living
Climbing 12 to 15 steps without aid
Слайд 12

Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) A self-administered instrument (using

Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI)

A self-administered instrument (using 10-cm

horizontal visual analog scales) that comprises 6 questions: Over the last one week, how would you describe the overall level of:
Fatigue/tiredness
AS spinal (back, neck) or hip pain
Pain/swelling in joints other than above
Level of discomfort from tender areas
Morning stiffness from the time you awake
How long does morning stiffness last?
Слайд 13

ASsessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS) ASAS 20: An improvement of >

ASsessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS)

ASAS 20: An improvement of > 20%

and absolute improvement of > 10 units on a 0–100 scale in > 3 of the following 4 domains:
Patient global assessment (by VAS global assessment)
Pain assessment (the average of VAS total and nocturnal pain scores)
Function (represented by BASFI)
Inflammation (the average of the BASDAI’s last two VAS concerning morning stiffness intensity and duration)
Absence of deterioration in the potential remaining domain
(deterioration is defined as > 20% worsening)
Слайд 14

Introduction of Anti-TNF Agents for the Treatment of Ankylosing Spondylitis US

Introduction of Anti-TNF Agents for the Treatment of Ankylosing Spondylitis

US Modifications

of the ASAS International Guidelines for Use of Anti-TNF Agents
Слайд 15

Tumor Necrosis Factor: Functions of the Proinflammatory Cytokine Stimulation of endothelial

Tumor Necrosis Factor: Functions of the Proinflammatory Cytokine

Stimulation of endothelial cells

to express adhesion molecules
Recruitment of white blood cells in inflamed synovium and skin
Induction of inflammatory cytokine production (e.g., IL-1, IL-6)
Stimulation of synovial cells to release collagenases
Induction of bone and cartilage resorption
Stimulation of fibroblast proliferation
Слайд 16

Pathogenesis of Joint Destruction Bone Erosions Macrophages Endothelium Synoviocytes ↑ Proinflammatory

Pathogenesis of Joint Destruction

Bone Erosions

Macrophages

Endothelium

Synoviocytes

↑ Proinflammatory cytokines
↑ Chemokines

↑ Adhesion molecules

Metalloproteinase synthesis

Articular Cartilage
Degradation

Increased Cell Infiltration

Increased
Inflammation

Osteoclast
progenitors

↑ RANKL expression

TNF

Слайд 17

US Modifications of the ASAS International Guidelines: Appropriate Patients for Anti-TNF

US Modifications of the ASAS International Guidelines: Appropriate Patients for Anti-TNF

Therapy

Definitive AS according to Modified New York Criteria
Active disease for ≥ 4 weeks
BASDAI > 4 cm at two times, 1 month apart
Physician Global Assessment ≥ 2 on Likert Scale
Treatment Failures
All types AS – lack of response/intolerability > 2 NSAIDs for ≥ 3 months
Patients with peripheral arthritis – lack of response/intolerability to > 1 DMARD, sulfasalazine preferred

Слайд 18

Contraindications for Anti-TNF Therapy Current or recurrent infections Tuberculosis Multiple sclerosis Lupus Malignancy Pregnant or lactating

Contraindications for Anti-TNF Therapy

Current or recurrent infections
Tuberculosis
Multiple sclerosis
Lupus
Malignancy
Pregnant or lactating

Слайд 19

Monitoring and Discontinuing Treatment With Anti-TNF Agents ASAS core set of

Monitoring and Discontinuing Treatment With Anti-TNF Agents

ASAS core set of outcome

parameters to monitor patients
Physical function, pain, spinal mobility, patient’s global assessment, stiffness, peripheral joints and entheses, acute phase reactant, fatigue
Assess at 6 to 8 weeks and discontinue patients who do not meet response criteria
BASDAI: Reduction of ≥ 2 units and
Physician Global Assessment > 1
Слайд 20

Anti-TNF Agents Etanercept Approved in the United States and Europe for

Anti-TNF Agents

Etanercept
Approved in the United States and Europe for treatment of

AS
Dose: 50 mg SC per week as two 25 mg injections administered on same day or 3 to 4 days apart
Infliximab
Approved in Europe for treatment of AS
Dose: 5 mg/kg IV at week 0, 2, and 6 and every 6 to 8 weeks thereafter
Слайд 21

Etanercept Vs. Infliximab: Pharmacologic Characteristics

Etanercept Vs. Infliximab: Pharmacologic Characteristics

Слайд 22

Etanercept vs Infliximab: Clinical Differences Etanercept Approved by FDA for treatment

Etanercept vs Infliximab: Clinical Differences

Etanercept
Approved by FDA for treatment of psoriatic arthritis,

rheumatoid arthritis, juvenile rheumatoid arthritis, and AS
Infliximab
Approved by FDA for treatment of Crohn’s disease and rheumatoid arthritis
Safety
Tuberculosis and histoplasmosis
Post-marketing reports and FDA surveillance database indicate disproportionate association between infliximab and risk of such (opportunistic) infections
Слайд 23

Etanercept for the Treatment of AS: Clinical Trials Marzo-Ortega, et al.

Etanercept for the Treatment of AS: Clinical Trials

Marzo-Ortega, et al.
Significant

improvement in all clinical and functional parameters with etanercept treatment
86% MRI-detected entheseal lesions regressed completely or improved
Marzo-Ortega, et al.
Mean hip and spine BMD increased with 24 weeks’ etanercept treatment
Gorman, et al.
80% etanercept-treated patients, 30% placebo-treated patients achieved ASAS 20 at 4 months
6-month extension: 83%, 80%, 60% achieved ASAS 20, ASAS 50, ASAS 70, respectively
95% of patients treated only with etanercept (not placebo) over 10 months achieved ASAS 20
Слайд 24

Etanercept for the Treatment of AS: Clinical Trials (cont) Brandt, et

Etanercept for the Treatment of AS: Clinical Trials (cont)

Brandt, et al.
57%

etanercept-treated patients and 6% placebo-treated patients improved at least 50% on BASDAI
56% in placebo group improved following switch to etanercept
Improvements ceased once etanercept therapy was discontinued
Davis, et al.
57% etanercept-treated patients and 22% placebo-treated patients achieved ASAS 20 at 24 weeks
Слайд 25

Etanercept: Adverse Events *P

Etanercept: Adverse Events
*P<.0001; †P<.050; ‡P<.020

Слайд 26

Etanercept: Adverse Events (cont) Serious infections and sepsis Mainly in patients

Etanercept: Adverse Events (cont)

Serious infections and sepsis
Mainly in patients with underlying

illness or receiving immunosuppressive therapy
CNS demyelinating disorders
Causal relationship unclear
Use with caution or avoid use in patients with transverse myelitis, optic neuritis, multiple sclerosis
Pancytopenia
Causal relationship unclear
Use with caution in patients with history of hematologic abnormalities
Autoantibody formation
– Discontinue if lupus-like symptoms are observed
Heart failure
Carefully monitor if prescribed to patients with heart failure
Слайд 27

Infliximab for the Treatment of AS: Clinical Trials Brandt, et al.

Infliximab for the Treatment of AS: Clinical Trials

Brandt, et al.
≥ 50%

improvement on outcome variables (ie, BASDAI, BASFI, pain on VAS, BASMI, QOL (SF-36) with 5 mg/kg dose of infliximab; ≥ 15% improvement with 3 mg/kg dose
Braun
53% of infliximab-treated patients and 9% placebo-treated patients experienced regression of disease activity of ≥ 50%
Function and quality of life significantly improved with infliximab treatment (P<.0001)
Van den Bosch
Significant improvement with infliximab compared with placebo on patient and physician global assessments of disease activity (P<.001)
Слайд 28

Infliximab for the Treatment of AS: Clinical Trials (cont) Stone, et

Infliximab for the Treatment of AS: Clinical Trials (cont)

Stone, et al.
Improvement

of > 60% at week 6 and > 75% at week 14 observed in BASDAI, BASFI, patient global assessment, physician global assessment, spinal pain and total body pain, and HAQ
Improvement on MRI scans
Maksymowych, et al.
Significant improvement* on BASDAI; significant mean reduction in BASFI, BASGI, ESR, and CRP at week 14
Efficacy sustained at 1 year

*P<.001, all parameters except CRP, P=.01

Слайд 29

Infliximab: Adverse Events * Approximation based on all clinical studies

Infliximab: Adverse Events

* Approximation based on all clinical studies

Слайд 30

Infliximab: Adverse Events (cont) Serious infections and sepsis Cases in patients

Infliximab: Adverse Events (cont)

Serious infections and sepsis
Cases in patients on concomitant

immunosuppressive therapy
Neurologic events
Use with caution in patients with pre-existing CNS demyelinating or seizure disorders
Autoantibody formation
Discontinue if lupus-like symptoms are observed
Heart failure
Consider other treatment options in patients with heart failure
Closely monitor patients if infliximab is administered
Слайд 31

Anti-TNF Agents: Summary Anti-TNF agents target underlying inflammatory process Alter disease

Anti-TNF Agents: Summary

Anti-TNF agents target underlying inflammatory process
Alter disease progression
Provide symptomatic

relief
Recommended treatment after trial of chronic daily NSAIDs, physical therapy, and regular exercise
Good safety and tolerability profiles
Long-term data needed
Implement treatment guidelines to ensure proper treatment given to appropriate patients
Treatment algorithm presented on next two slides
Слайд 32

AS Treatment Algorithm: Patients with Axial AS Alternative Options Pamidronate Thalidomide

AS Treatment Algorithm: Patients with Axial AS

Alternative Options
Pamidronate
Thalidomide

*Only biologic approved for treatment

of AS in US and Europe
†Approved in Europe only for treatment of AS
This treatment algorithm contains unlabeled use of infliximab, pamidronate and thalidomide.

Anti-TNF agents
Etanercept 50 mg SC per week as two 25 mg injections in the same day or 3-4 days apart*
Infliximab 5 mg/kg at 0, 2, and 6 weeks and every 6 to 8 weeks thereafter†
Contraindicated in patients with infections, tuberculosis, multiple sclerosis, lupus, malignancy, and pregnancy/lactation

Initiate physical therapy plan with long-
term exercise program to accompany
pharmacologic intervention
Emphasize posture, range of motion, and strengthening

NSAIDs or Selective COX-2 inhibitors
Efficacy and safety comparable between non-selective agents
Selective COX-2 efficacy comparable, better safety profile, higher cost that non-selective NSAIDs
Failure of at least two different NSAIDs/selective COX-2 inhibitors
for minimum of 3 months