Introduction to comparative politics. Origins of the State. In the USA, everything that is not American politics is called CP

Содержание

Слайд 2

Giovanni Sartori 1 In the USA, everything that is not American

Giovanni Sartori 1

In the USA, everything that is not American politics

is called CP.
Why do we compare?
To control, whether a generalization applies. How can we know if we study only one country?
Can you compare implicitly? Yes! Single case studies are for theory-building not theory-confirming.
Слайд 3

Giovanni Sartori 2 What is comparable ? More importantly, in which

Giovanni Sartori 2

What is comparable ? More importantly, in which respect?

 
Systems as similar as possible excepting the one aspect we are interested in investigating.
OR
Very different systems, yet which do not differ on the phenomenon under investigation.
Слайд 4

The State Its emergence occurred for very different reasons in EU

The State

Its emergence occurred for very different reasons in EU and

the rest of the world.
Democracy is now almost inconceivable without a modern State.
States seem to have become the only legitimate political organizations.
Слайд 5

Origins of the State 1 Expansionist wars of EU kingdoms led

Origins of the State 1

Expansionist wars of EU kingdoms led to

the unification of small political entities under the authority of larger ones.
Coercion and monopolisation.
War imperatives of EU kingdoms triggered the need for greater taxation.
Taxation demands greater control of the population.
Control leads to the development of a bureaucracy.
Слайд 6

Origins of the State 2 Permanent hostility and rivalry in Europe.

Origins of the State 2

Permanent hostility and rivalry in Europe.
Declining feudal

order.
Nascent bourgeoisie and technical developments of military weapons (firearms), making obsolete the old defenses of fortified towns.
Слайд 7

Treaty of Westphalia 1648 Thirty Years’ War - a religious war

Treaty of Westphalia 1648

Thirty Years’ War - a religious war that

opposed the Holy Roman Empire and German princes, protestant States and France.
The war became less about religion and more of a rivalry for political pre-eminence.
Symbolises a new political arrangement: political sovereignty of the secular Nation-State.
Слайд 8

Map of Europe 1648

Map of Europe 1648

Слайд 9

Thomas Hobbes’ Leviathan 1651 Non est potestas Super Terram quae Comparetur

Thomas Hobbes’ Leviathan 1651

Non est potestas Super Terram quae Comparetur ei.


There is no power on the earth that can be compared to him.
Слайд 10

Thomas Hobbes 1588-1679

Thomas Hobbes 1588-1679

Слайд 11

Thomas Hobbes’ Leviathan State of nature defined as the war against

Thomas Hobbes’ Leviathan

State of nature defined as the war against all

in an anarchical system.
Fear of violent death pushes humans to surrender their freedom to the Leviathan (the State) in exchange of protection.
Слайд 12

Jean-Jacques Rousseau 1 The Social Contract (1762) State of nature: People

Jean-Jacques Rousseau 1 The Social Contract (1762)

State of nature: People are neither

good nor bad, but were born as a blank slate, and later society and the environment influence which way we lean.
Asserts that only the people, who are sovereign, have that all-powerful right.
Слайд 13

Jean-Jacques Rousseau 1712-1778

Jean-Jacques Rousseau 1712-1778

Слайд 14

Jean-Jacques Rousseau 2 Monarchs are not divinely empowered to legislate. Participants

Jean-Jacques Rousseau 2

Monarchs are not divinely empowered to legislate.
Participants must

have a right to choose the laws under which they live.
The Social Contract inspired revolutionary movements in Europe, France.
Слайд 15

Charles Tilly 1 New political organizations began to develop in competition

Charles Tilly 1

New political organizations began to develop in competition with

their rivals.
Racket protection against marauders is at the origin of the State.
Mercantile capitalism and State making reinforced each other.
Слайд 16

Charles Tilly 1929-2002

Charles Tilly 1929-2002

Слайд 17

Charles Tilly 2 The intention was not to create a State

Charles Tilly 2

The intention was not to create a State but

to enjoy the advantages of power.
Debt and taxes rose enormously from the 17th century. As a function of the increasing cost of war making.
Слайд 18

Charles Tilly 3 Governments stand out from other organizations by their

Charles Tilly 3

Governments stand out from other organizations by their tendency

to monopolize the concentrated means of violence.
The distinction between "legitimate" and "illegitimate" force, furthermore, makes no difference to the fact.
Success depends on the degree of resistance of the population.