Содержание
- 2. Lecture Objectives Introduce the idea of and rationale for Bayesian perspective and Bayesian VARs Understand the
- 3. Introduction: Two Perspectives in Econometrics Let θ be a vector of parameters to be estimated using
- 4. Outline Why a Bayesian Approach to VARs? Brief Introduction to Bayesian Econometrics Analytical Examples Estimating a
- 5. Why a Bayesian Approach to VAR? Dimensionality problem with VARs: y contains n variables, p lags
- 6. Usually, only a fraction of estimated coefficients are statistically significant parsimonious modeling should be favored What
- 7. Combining information: prior and posterior Bayesian coefficient estimates combine information in the prior with evidence from
- 8. Shrinkage There are many approaches to reducing over-parameterization in VARs A common idea is shrinkage Incorporating
- 9. Forecasting Performance of BVAR vs. alternatives Source: Litterman, 1986 BVAR provides better forecast of Real GNP
- 10. Introduction to Bayesian Econometrics: Objects of Interest Objects of interest: Prior distribution: Likelihood function: - likelihood
- 11. Bayesian Econometrics: Objects of Interest (2) The marginal likelihood… …is independent of the parameters of the
- 12. Bayesian Econometrics: maximizing criterion For practical purposes, it is useful to focus on the criterion: Traditionally,
- 13. Bayesian Econometrics : maximizing criterion (2) Maximizing C(θ) gives the Bayes mode. In some cases (i.e.
- 14. Analytical Examples Let’s work on some analytical examples: Sample mean Linear regression model
- 15. Estimating a Sample Mean Let yt~ i.i.d. N(μ,σ2), then the data density function is: where y={y1,…yT}
- 16. Estimating a Sample Mean The posterior of μ: …has the following analytical form with So, we
- 17. Estimating a Sample Mean: Example Assume the true distribution is Normal yt~N(3,1) So, μ=3 is known
- 18. Compute the posterior distribution as sample size increases Posterior with prior N(1,1) Already after 10 draws
- 19. Then, we look at more informative (tight) prior and set ν =50 (higher precision) Posterior with
- 20. Examples: Regression Model I Linear Regression model: where ut~ i.i.d. N(0,σ2) Assume: β is random and
- 21. Assume that the prior mean of β has multivariate Normal distribution N(m,σ2M): where the key parameters
- 22. Examples: Regression Model I (3) We mix information – densities of data and prior – to
- 23. Since we do not like black boxes… there are 2 ways to get m* and M*
- 24. Define a “new” regression model We simply stack our “ingredients” together to mix the information (prior
- 25. Examples: Regression Model II So far the life was easy(-ier), in the linear regression model β
- 26. Examples: Regression Model II () To manipulate the product …we assume the following distributions: Normal for
- 27. Examples: Regression Model II (3) By manipulating the product (see more details in the appendix B)
- 28. Priors: summary In the above examples we dealt with 2 types of prior distributions of our
- 29. Bayesian VARs Linear Regression examples will help us to deal with our main object – Bayesian
- 30. VAR in a matrix form: example Consider, as an example, a VAR for n variables and
- 31. How to Estimate a BVAR: Case 1 Prior Consider Case 1 prior for a VAR: coefficients
- 32. Before we see the case of an unknown Σe need to introduce a multivariate distribution to
- 33. How to Estimate a BVAR: Conjugate Priors Assume Conjugate priors: The VAR parameters A and Σe
- 34. BVARs: Minnesota Prior Implementation The Minnesota prior – a particular case of the “Case 1 prior”
- 35. The Minnesota prior The prior variance for the coefficient of lag k in equation i for
- 36. The Minnesota prior Interpretation: the prior on the first own lag is the prior on the
- 37. BVARs: Minnesota Prior Implementation
- 38. BVARs: Prior Selection Minnesota and conjugate priors are useful (e.g., to obtain closed-form solutions), but can
- 39. Del Negro and Schorfheide (2004): DSGE-VAR Approach Del Negro and Schorfheide (2004) We want to estimate
- 40. Del Negro and Schorfheide (2004) We estimate the following BVAR: The solution for the DSGE model
- 41. Del Negro and Schorfheide (2004) Parameter λ is a “weight” of “artificial” (prior) data from DSGE
- 42. Likelihood of the VAR of a DSGE Model Recall the likelihood function for an unconstrained VAR
- 43. Next step: we simulate s→∞ artificial observations (Y*,X*) from the DSGE …and replace sample moments like
- 44. Conditional on the parameters θ, the DSGE m+odel provides a conjugate priors for the BVAR For
- 45. DSGE-VAR posterior Posterior, conditional on θ : where Prior info, weighted by λT Information from Data
- 46. BVARs (under different λ’s) have advantage in forecasting performance (RMSE) vis-à-vis the unrestricted VAR The “optimal”
- 47. BVAR with the DSGE prior under the “optimal” λ has better forecasting performance than: the unrestricted
- 48. Kadiyala and Karlsson (1997) Small Model: a bivariate VAR with unemployment and industrial production Sample period:
- 49. Kadiyala and Karlsson (1997) Compare different priors based on the VAR forecasting performance (RMSE) Standard VAR(p)…
- 50. Prior distributions in K&K K&K use a number of competing prior distributions… Minnesota, Normal-Wishart, Normal-Diffuse, Extended
- 51. Prior distributions in K&K In the Small Model: For prior distributions, hyper-parameters π1= γ, π2=wγ are
- 52. Forecast Comparison in K&K: Small Model, unemployment Forecasting performance is markedly different for different priors Normal-Wishart,
- 53. Forecast Comparison in K&K: Large Model OLS and Diffuse priors produce worst forecasts in all cases
- 54. Giannone, Lenza and Primiceri (2011) Use three VARs to compare forecasting performance Small VAR: GDP, GDP
- 55. Giannone, Lenza and Primiceri (2011) The marginal likelihood is obtained by integrating out the parameters of
- 56. Giannone, Lenza and Primiceri (2011) We interpret the model as a hierarchical model by replacing pγ(θ)=p(θ|γ)
- 57. Giannone, Lenza and Primiceri (2011)
- 58. In all cases BVARs demonstrate better forecasting performance vis-à-vis the unrestricted VARs BVARs are roughly at
- 59. Conclusions BVARs is a useful tool to improve forecasts This is not a “black box” posterior
- 60. Thank You!
- 61. Appendix A: Remarks about the marginal likelihood Remarks about the marginal likelihood: If we have M1,….MN
- 62. Appendix A: Remarks about the marginal likelihood Remarks about the marginal likelihood: Predict the first observation
- 63. Appendix B: Linear Regression with conjugate priors To calculate the posterior distribution for parameters …we assume
- 64. Rearranging the expressions under the exponents we have the following: where Further denote … and rewrite
- 65. Therefore we have Normal posterior distribution for β: β|σ2 ̴ N(m*, σ2M*) And Invesrse Gamma posterior
- 66. Appendix C: How to Estimate a BVAR, Case 1 prior Use GLS estimator for the regression
- 67. Appendix C: How to Estimate a BVAR, Case 1 Prior Continue So, the moments for the
- 68. Appendix D: How to Estimate a BVAR: Conjugate Priors Note that in the case of the
- 69. Appendix E: Prior and Posterior distributions in Kadiyala and Karlsson (1997)
- 70. Appendix E: Posterior distributions of forecast for unemployment and industrial production in K&K (1997), h=4, T0
- 71. Appendix E: Posterior distribution of the unemployment rate forecast in K&K (1997)
- 73. Скачать презентацию