Leadership & Motivation

Содержание

Слайд 2

Stogdill (1974) Analyzed 163 published studies to discover the role of

Stogdill (1974)

Analyzed 163 published studies to discover the role of traits

in leadership.
Found that personality and situational factors play a role in leadership.
Concluded a leader’s characteristics are part of leadership.
Found that leaders in one situation may not necessarily be leaders in a different situation.
Leadership is not passive. It is about a working relationship between the leader and other group members.
Слайд 3

Stogdill (1974) Stogdill identified a number of traits that we positively

Stogdill (1974)

Stogdill identified a number of traits that we positively associated

with leadership…
Drive for responsibility and task completion
Vigour and persistence in pursuit of goals
Risk taking and originality in problem solving
Drive to exercise initiative in social settings
Self-confidence and sense of personal identity
Accepts consequences of decisions and actions
Слайд 4

Stogdill (1974) 7. Readiness to absorb interpersonal stress 8. Willingness to

Stogdill (1974)

7. Readiness to absorb interpersonal stress
8. Willingness to tolerate frustration

and delay
9. Ability to influence other people’s behaviour
10. Able to influence social interaction to the purpose at hand
Слайд 5

Findings of Major Leadership Studies Stogdill (1948) Mann (1959) Stogdill (1974)

Findings of Major Leadership Studies

Stogdill (1948)

Mann (1959)

Stogdill (1974)

Lord, De Vader &

Alliger (1986)

Kirkpatrick & Locke (1991)

Zaccaro, Kemp & Bader (2004)

Intelligence
Alertness
Insight
Responsibility
Initiative
Persistence
Self-confidence
Sociability

Intelligence
Masculinity
Adjustment
Dominance
Extroversion
Conservatism

Achievement
Persistence
Insight
Self-Confidence
Responsibility
Cooperativeness
Tolerance
Influence
Sociability

Intelligence
Masculinity
Dominance

Drive
Motivation
Integrity
Confidence
Cognitive Ability
Task knowledge

Cognitive abilities
Extroversion
Conscientiousness
Emotional stability
Openness
Agreeableness
Motivation
Social intelligence
Self monitoring
Problem solving

Stogdill (1948)

Mann (1959)

Stogdill (1948)

Stogdill (1974)

Stogdill (1948)

Lord, De Vader & Alliger (1986)

Stogdill (1974)

Stogdill (1948)

Kirkpatrick & Locke (1991)

Lord, De Vader & Alliger (1986)

Stogdill (1974)

Stogdill (1948)

Zaccaro, Kemp & Bader (2004)

Kirkpatrick & Locke (1991)

Lord, De Vader & Alliger (1986)

Stogdill (1974)

Mann (1959)

Stogdill (1948)

Слайд 6

Which 5 are most important? Talk to the person sitting next

Which 5 are most important?

Talk to the person sitting next to

you
See if you can agree together on the top 5 most important leadership traits…then we will see how much agreement there is across the class.
Then I will show you a generally accepted top 5
Слайд 7

Northouse (2010) Northouse identifies the following 5 traits as central to

Northouse (2010)

Northouse identifies the following 5 traits as central to leadership:
Intelligence
Self-Confidence
Determination
Integrity
Sociability

Слайд 8

Intelligence Intelligence (intellectual ability) – leaders tend to have higher intelligence

Intelligence

Intelligence (intellectual ability) – leaders tend to have higher intelligence than

non-leaders
Verbal ability; perceptual ability and reasoning skills appear to make you a better leader
A leader’s ability should not be too much higher than non-leaders. If the leader’s IQ is a lot higher it can be counter-productive…for example; with communication
Слайд 9

Self-Confidence This is the ability to be certain about one’s competencies

Self-Confidence

This is the ability to be certain about one’s competencies and

skills.
It includes a sense of self-esteem and self-assurance and the belief that one can make a difference
Self-confidence allows us to influence others, influencing is important to leadership success
Слайд 10

Determination This is the desire to get the job done. It

Determination

This is the desire to get the job done.
It includes initiative,

persistence, dominance and drive.
People with determination are willing to assert themselves, be proactive and persevere in the face of obstacles
Determination means being able to show dominance at times where followers need directing.
Слайд 11

Integrity This is the quality of honesty and trustworthiness. People who

Integrity

This is the quality of honesty and trustworthiness.
People who stick to

a strong set of principles and take responsibility for their actions are displaying integrity.
Leaders with integrity inspire confidence in others because they can be trusted to do what they say they are going to do.
Слайд 12

Sociability This is a leader’s inclination to seek out pleasant and

Sociability

This is a leader’s inclination to seek out pleasant and social

relationships.
Leaders who show sociability are friendly, outgoing, courteous, tactful and diplomatic.
They are sensitive to others’ needs and show concern for their well-being.
Social leaders have good interpersonal skills and create cooperative relationships with their followers.
Слайд 13

Leadership and Masculinity Two key studies identified masculinity as an important

Leadership and Masculinity

Two key studies identified masculinity as an important trait

of leadership.
Have a look over some questions and we will discuss this as a group.
Слайд 14

What is Personality? We have looked at a number of personality

What is Personality?

We have looked at a number of personality traits

or characteristics that influence leadership, but what is personality?
Over the past 25 years a consensus has emerged on what makes a personality. These factors are often called The Big 5
Слайд 15

The Big 5 Personality Factors Neuroticism Extraversion Openness Agreeableness Conscientiousness The

The Big 5 Personality Factors

Neuroticism

Extraversion

Openness

Agreeableness

Conscientiousness

The tendency to be depressed, anxious, insecure,

vulnerable and hostile

The tendency to be sociable and assertive and to have positive energy

The tendency to be informed, creative, insightful and curious

The tendency to be accepting, conforming, trusting and nurturing

The tendency to be thorough, organized, controlled, dependable and decisive

Слайд 16

The Big 5: Self Assessment I have designed a test for

The Big 5: Self Assessment

I have designed a test for you

so that you can assess your personality type.
It will give you an indication of your strengths for leadership
Слайд 17

The Big 5 and Leadership Judge, Bono, Ilies and Gerhardt (2002)

The Big 5 and Leadership

Judge, Bono, Ilies and Gerhardt (2002) conducted

a meta-analysis of 78 leadership studies published between 1967 and 1998.
They found a strong relationship between the big 5 and leadership.
Specifically, extraversion was strongly associated with leadership (followed by conscientiousness, openness and low neuroticism).
Слайд 18

Weaknesses of the Trait Approach There’s no definitive list of traits.

Weaknesses of the Trait Approach


There’s no definitive list of traits. Lists

vary on what traits good leaders should possess.
The list of traits identified seems almost endless.
Trait leadership does not take into account the situation. Leaders with certain positive traits may not be equally effective in different situations.
The trait approach has resulted in highly subjective determinations of the most important traits. Who’s to say which are worth more than others?
Traits do not focus on leadership outcomes. How do traits affect groups and their work?
Слайд 19

Emotional Intelligence Another way of assessing the impact of traits on

Emotional Intelligence

Another way of assessing the impact of traits on leadership

is through emotional intelligence. EQ emerged in the 1990s as an area of psychology.
EQ is about emotions (affective domain) and thinking (cognitive domain).
EQ is about ability to understand emotions and apply it to life tasks.
Слайд 20

Emotional Intelligence We can define EQ as “…the ability to perceive

Emotional Intelligence

We can define EQ as “…the ability to perceive and

express emotions, to use emotions to facilitate thinking, to understand and reason with emotions and to effectively manage emotions within oneself and in relationships with others
(Mayer, Salovey & Caruso: 2002)
Слайд 21

EQ as a model

EQ as a model

Слайд 22

EQ as a model

EQ as a model

Слайд 23

Leadership & Motivation MGT 5206 Lecture 5 Ethics and Leadership

Leadership & Motivation

MGT 5206
Lecture 5
Ethics and Leadership

Слайд 24

Ethics What are ethics and why are they important to leadership?

Ethics

What are ethics and why are they important to leadership?

Слайд 25

Ethics code of morality: a system of moral principles governing the

Ethics

code of morality: a system of moral principles governing the appropriate

conduct for a person or group. Ethics help us distinguish between good and evil; right and wrong.
Слайд 26

Your Ethics What ethical principles do you live by? For example:

Your Ethics

What ethical principles do you live by?
For example:
not dropping

litter on the street
Not speeding in your car
Giving up your seat to the elderly on the bus
Слайд 27

Hot Topic Ethics (and Codes of Conduct) are at the top

Hot Topic

Ethics (and Codes of Conduct) are at the top of

the list of priorities for organizations today.
Major corporate collapses due to a failure in business ethics (e.g. Enron; WorldCom – see the Intranet) have made the issue critical.
A breakdown in ethics was at the centre of the Global Financial Crisis.
Governments pass laws to enforce ethics but they don’t always work (US Congress Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002…didn’t stop GFC)
Слайд 28

Ethics Differ There is no single set of ethics from country

Ethics Differ

There is no single set of ethics from country to

country. What is ethical in one place is unethical in another.
In many countries bribes are unethical and unlawful…in other countries they are standard business practice.
Ethical practices also vary from one kind of business to another. The public sector may have a different code of ethics to a fast food chain
Слайд 29

Legal-Ethical Contradiction

Legal-Ethical Contradiction

Слайд 30

Organizational Ethics

Organizational Ethics

Слайд 31

Traits, Attitudes and Ethics Ethical behaviour is related to personality traits

Traits, Attitudes and Ethics

Ethical behaviour is related to personality traits and

attitudes
Agreeableness can lead to poor ethical decisions as leaders may just want to please the group
Openness is positively linked with ethical behaviour
Leaders with high conscientiousness tend to be more ethical
Leaders with low extraversion more unethical
Слайд 32

Moral Development Ethical behaviour is also linked to moral development Moral

Moral Development

Ethical behaviour is also linked to moral development
Moral development is

about understanding right from wrong and choosing to do the right thing
Our ability to make ethical choices is related to our level of moral development
There are three levels of moral development: Preconventional; Conventional; Postconventional
Слайд 33

Moral Development Preconventional – You choose right and wrong based on

Moral Development

Preconventional – You choose right and wrong based on your

self-interest and the consequences
Conventional – You seek to maintain accepted standards and live up to the expectations of others
Postconventional – You make an effort to define moral principles that are above everything else
Слайд 34

Moral Development Preconventional: “I lie to customers to sell more products

Moral Development

Preconventional: “I lie to customers to sell more products and

earn higher commissions for myself”
This leadership style is autocratic towards others while using position for self-advantage

Conventional: “I lie to customers because the other sales reps do”
This leadership style is tactical and reactive. It serves a perceived business objective or practice before people and encourages followers to fit in with general practices

Preconventional: “I do not lie to customers because it is wrong”
This leadership style is visionary and committed to serving others and a higher cause while empowering followers to do the same

Слайд 35

The Situation The third factor influencing ethical behaviour is the situation

The Situation

The third factor influencing ethical behaviour is the situation

Highly competitive

Uncompetitive

Unsupervised

/ unregulated

Highly supervised / regulated

unethical

ethical

Слайд 36

What do you think? Which industries / organizations / professionals are

What do you think?

Which industries / organizations / professionals are unregulated

and unsupervised?
Which industries / organizations / professionals are regulated and supervised?
Слайд 37

The Situation Unethical behaviour in organizations also occurs… When there is

The Situation

Unethical behaviour in organizations also occurs…
When there is no code

of conduct
When unethical behaviour goes unpunished
When unethical behaviour is rewarded
When individuals are paid on commission
When the offender is popular or senior
When risk is highly valued
When people are punished for mistakes
Слайд 38

Justifying Unethical Behaviour Most people do not like to consider themselves

Justifying Unethical Behaviour

Most people do not like to consider themselves as

unethical. So, when they do unethical things, they use an excuse to justify their behaviour. This prevents them from having a guilty conscience.
There are 7 common justifications people use
Слайд 39

1. Moral Justification This is where people claim they acted in

1. Moral Justification

This is where people claim they acted in an

unethical / immoral way to achieve a higher good or purpose.
The 9/11 bombers used this justification. They committed their acts as a religious duty; as part of a war against the West and its values.

For 2,000 years people have justified acts of War as being ‘holy’ or for ‘God’s glory’. Abortion doctors in the USA have been murdered on moral grounds… ‘to save the lives of unborn babies’

Слайд 40

2. Displacement of Responsibility This is where people blame their unethical

2. Displacement of Responsibility

This is where people blame their unethical behaviour

on others…
“I was only following orders…”
“She told me to do it…”

This was a defense of many senior Nazis at the Nuremburg trials after WWII. Also in the case of office workers who falsify documents for their boss such as in Arthur Anderson corporate collapse.

Слайд 41

3. Diffusion of Responsibility This is where people use membership of

3. Diffusion of Responsibility

This is where people use membership of a

group to blame what they personally do…
“Everybody here steals from the office…”
“We all take bribes, that’s how it is here…”
“Everyone in the team fakes injury to get a free kick”

Common argument of sportspeople who get caught taking drugs that ‘everybody in the sport’ is doing it.

Слайд 42

4. Advantageous Comparison This is where people compare their unethical behaviour

4. Advantageous Comparison

This is where people compare their unethical behaviour to

others who are worse…
“I only steal coins from the store…but he takes the notes as well”
“We pollute less than our competitors do”

In war, each side always says that the other side is doing worse things.

Слайд 43

5. Disregard or Distortion of Consequences This is where people minimize

5. Disregard or Distortion of Consequences

This is where people minimize the

harm caused by unethical behaviour…
“If I lie on my tax form about my income they will never know, and if they find out I will only get a warning anyway”

Companies that use substitute ingredients in food manufacturing to save money argue “it tastes the same anyway” or “it does not harm anyone”

Слайд 44

6. Attribution of Blame This is where people claim their unethical

6. Attribution of Blame

This is where people claim their unethical behaviour

was just a response (or caused by) someone else’s behaviour
“I hit him because he called my girlfriend a terrible name”
“I had to drive fast because the car behind me was chasing me”

Again, after a war, people say “If I didn’t kill that family my captain would have killed me”. Countries sometimes say “we are spying on them because we think they are building nuclear weapons”

Слайд 45

7. Euphemistic Labeling This is where people use “soft” words to

7. Euphemistic Labeling

This is where people use “soft” words to describe

their unethical behaviour to hide how bad it is.
Freedom Fighter sounds better than terrorist
protest march sounds better than riot
Questioned sounds better than interrogated
Disagreement sounds better than fighting